Literature DB >> 20133326

Breastfeeding, the use of docosahexaenoic acid-fortified formulas in infancy and neuropsychological function in childhood.

Catharine R Gale1, Lynne D Marriott, Christopher N Martyn, Jennifer Limond, Hazel M Inskip, Keith M Godfrey, Catherine M Law, Cyrus Cooper, Carolyn West, Siân M Robinson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relation between breastfeeding, use of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)-fortified formula and neuropsychological function in children.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Southampton, UK.
SUBJECTS: 241 children aged 4 years followed up from birth. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: IQ measured by the Wechsler Pre-School and Primary Scale of Intelligence (3rd edn), visual attention, visuomotor precision, sentence repetition and verbal fluency measured by the NEPSY, and visual form-constancy measured by the Test of Visual-Perceptual Skills (Non-Motor).
RESULTS: In unadjusted analyses, children for whom breast milk or DHA-fortified formula was the main method of feeding throughout the first 6 months of life had higher mean full-scale and verbal IQ scores at age 4 years than those fed mainly unfortified formula. After adjustment for potential confounding factors, particularly maternal IQ and educational attainment, the differences in IQ between children in the breast milk and unfortified formula groups were severely attenuated, but children who were fed DHA-fortified formula had full-scale and verbal IQ scores that were respectively 5.62 (0.98 to 10.2) and 7.02 (1.56 to 12.4) points higher than children fed unfortified formula. However, estimated total intake of DHA in milk up to age 6 months was not associated with subsequent IQ or with score on any other test.
CONCLUSIONS: Differences in children's intelligence according to type of milk fed in infancy may be due more to confounding by maternal or family characteristics than to the amount of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids they receive in milk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20133326     DOI: 10.1136/adc.2009.165050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  7 in total

Review 1.  Designer foods and their benefits: A review.

Authors:  A Rajasekaran; M Kalaivani
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 2.701

2.  Omega-3 supplementation during the first 5 years of life and later academic performance: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  B K Brew; B G Toelle; K L Webb; C Almqvist; G B Marks
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  To what extent does confounding explain the association between breastfeeding duration and cognitive development up to age 14? Findings from the UK Millennium Cohort Study.

Authors:  Reneé Pereyra-Elías; Maria A Quigley; Claire Carson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 4.  Infant nutrition and lifelong health: current perspectives and future challenges.

Authors:  S M Robinson
Journal:  J Dev Orig Health Dis       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  Breast milk and cognitive development--the role of confounders: a systematic review.

Authors:  Asnat Walfisch; Corey Sermer; Alex Cressman; Gideon Koren
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Exclusive Breastfeeding Predicts Higher Hearing-Language Development in Girls of Preschool Age.

Authors:  Maria Angela Guzzardi; Federico Granziera; Elena Sanguinetti; Francesca Ditaranto; Filippo Muratori; Patricia Iozzo
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-08-02       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  The Influence of DHA on Language Development: A Review of Randomized Controlled Trials of DHA Supplementation in Pregnancy, the Neonatal Period, and Infancy.

Authors:  Nicola R Gawlik; Amanda J Anderson; Maria Makrides; Lisa Kettler; Jacqueline F Gould
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 5.717

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.