Literature DB >> 20133261

Visceral disease in patients with metastatic breast cancer: efficacy and safety of treatment with ixabepilone and other chemotherapeutic agents.

Denise A Yardley1.   

Abstract

Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have poor prognoses and 5-year survival rates of approximately 20%. The site(s) and degree of metastatic dissemination are among the principal prognostic factors for patients with MBC. Patients with visceral metastases to the liver and/or lung have a very poor prognosis. Although good performance status, restricted disease dissemination, and limited extent of metastatic infiltration are associated with higher responses to chemotherapy, responses are generally short lived, with rapid disease progression after treatment failure. Thus, novel strategies for the management of patients with MBC with visceral disease are urgently needed. We have analyzed outcomes of trials that evaluated various chemotherapeutic agents as monotherapy or in combination with capecitabine in patients with MBC with primary visceral disease involvement. Treatment with microtubule inhibitors such as paclitaxel, docetaxel, and albumin-bound paclitaxel, generally administered in earlier lines of treatment, resulted in comparable responses. Lower response rates (RRs) were reported with other agents such as capecitabine, vinorelbine, and gemcitabine. Adverse events consistent with known toxicities of each agent were observed in the selected trials and related to dose and administration schedule. The epothilone B analogue ixabepilone has demonstrated clinical efficacy and manageable safety in populations of heavily pretreated patients with MBC with high visceral disease burdens to liver and/or lung (61%-86% of patients). Objective RRs ranging from 12% to 57% have been reported for ixabepilone, as monotherapy and in combination with capecitabine, depending on degree of pretreatment. Responses to ixabepilone in patients with visceral metastases were comparable to those observed in overall study patient populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20133261     DOI: 10.3816/CBC.2010.n.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1526-8209            Impact factor:   3.225


  15 in total

Review 1.  The place for eribulin in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  William J Gradishar
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Claudin-2 is an independent negative prognostic factor in breast cancer and specifically predicts early liver recurrences.

Authors:  Siker Kimbung; Anikó Kovács; Pär-Ola Bendahl; Per Malmström; Mårten Fernö; Thomas Hatschek; Ingrid Hedenfalk
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 6.603

3.  Cancer-secreted miR-105 destroys vascular endothelial barriers to promote metastasis.

Authors:  Weiying Zhou; Miranda Y Fong; Yongfen Min; George Somlo; Liang Liu; Melanie R Palomares; Yang Yu; Amy Chow; Sean Timothy Francis O'Connor; Andrew R Chin; Yun Yen; Yafan Wang; Eric G Marcusson; Peiguo Chu; Jun Wu; Xiwei Wu; Arthur Xuejun Li; Zhuo Li; Hanlin Gao; Xiubao Ren; Mark P Boldin; Pengnian Charles Lin; Shizhen Emily Wang
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 31.743

4.  De novo sequencing of circulating miRNAs identifies novel markers predicting clinical outcome of locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Xiwei Wu; George Somlo; Yang Yu; Melanie R Palomares; Arthur Xuejun Li; Weiying Zhou; Amy Chow; Yun Yen; John J Rossi; Harry Gao; Jinhui Wang; Yate-Ching Yuan; Paul Frankel; Sierra Li; Kimlin Tam Ashing-Giwa; Guihua Sun; Yafan Wang; Robin Smith; Kim Robinson; Xiubao Ren; Shizhen Emily Wang
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 5.  Beyond taxanes: the next generation of microtubule-targeting agents.

Authors:  Javier Cortes; Maria Vidal
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Lyn modulates Claudin-2 expression and is a therapeutic target for breast cancer liver metastasis.

Authors:  Sébastien Tabariès; Matthew G Annis; Brian E Hsu; Christine E Tam; Paul Savage; Morag Park; Peter M Siegel
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-04-20

Review 7.  Management of patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer with visceral disease: challenges and treatment options.

Authors:  Wael A Harb
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 3.989

8.  CTBP1 and metabolic syndrome induce an mRNA and miRNA expression profile critical for breast cancer progression and metastasis.

Authors:  Paula L Farré; Georgina D Scalise; Rocío B Duca; Guillermo N Dalton; Cintia Massillo; Juliana Porretti; Karen Graña; Kevin Gardner; Paola De Luca; Adriana De Siervi
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-02-13

9.  The impact of metastatic sites in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma, systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized studies.

Authors:  Pedro Luiz Serrano Usón; Fernanda D'Avila Sampaio Tolentino; Vanessa Montes Santos; Edna Terezinha Rother; Fernando Cotait Maluf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Circulating tumor cells as early predictors of metastatic spread in breast cancer patients with limited metastatic dissemination.

Authors:  Mario Giuliano; Antonio Giordano; Summer Jackson; Ugo De Giorgi; Michal Mego; Evan N Cohen; Hui Gao; Simone Anfossi; Beverly C Handy; Naoto T Ueno; Ricardo H Alvarez; Sabino De Placido; Vicente Valero; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; James M Reuben; Massimo Cristofanilli
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.