Literature DB >> 20132966

An open-label pilot study evaluating by magnetic resonance imaging the potential for a disease-modifying effect of celecoxib compared to a modelized historical control cohort in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

Jean-Pierre Raynauld1, Johanne Martel-Pelletier, André Beaulieu, Louis Bessette, Frédéric Morin, Denis Choquette, Boulos Haraoui, François Abram, Jean-Pierre Pelletier.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging the effect of celecoxib 200 mg daily on cartilage volume loss over 12 months in knee osteoarthritis.
METHODS: The primary outcome of this study was to evaluate cartilage volume loss in the medial compartment of the knee (femoral condyle and tibial plateau) assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging on subjects receiving continuous treatment with celecoxib 200 mg daily for 12 months compared with a modelized historical control cohort, as expressed by the percentage loss from baseline. Safety of the medication was also assessed. Comparison of the observed volume loss to the expected loss was evaluated by a multivariate linear regression model based on a historical cohort.
RESULTS: For the primary outcome, the 95% confidence intervals for the mean observed celecoxib cohort joint medial compartment cartilage volume loss (6.81% [6.01; 7.60]) and mean predicted loss (modelized historical cohort) (5.65% [5.10; 6.19]) overlap, indicating no significant difference and hence no effect of celecoxib on the medial compartment cartilage volume loss. Similar findings were demonstrated for the lateral compartment cartilage loss. The safety data reported several minor adverse events similar to those typically seen in a 1-year clinical trial.
CONCLUSIONS: Although celecoxib was demonstrated to be safe for knee osteoarthritis at a 200 mg daily dose, it did not provide a protective effect on knee cartilage loss. Cohort modelization is an efficient and unbiased way to provide a comparator group for the assessment of novel treatments when classic head-to-head randomized controlled trials are not feasible.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20132966     DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2009.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0049-0172            Impact factor:   5.532


  14 in total

1.  Use magnetic resonance imaging to assess articular cartilage.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Wang; Anita E Wluka; Graeme Jones; Changhai Ding; Flavia M Cicuttini
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.346

Review 2.  Imaging of cartilage and bone: promises and pitfalls in clinical trials of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  F Eckstein; A Guermazi; G Gold; J Duryea; M-P Hellio Le Graverand; W Wirth; C G Miller
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 3.  Celecoxib: considerations regarding its potential disease-modifying properties in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Manon C Zweers; Tineke N de Boer; Joël van Roon; Johannes W J Bijlsma; Floris P J G Lafeber; Simon C Mastbergen
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.156

4.  Chondroitin sulphate reduces both cartilage volume loss and bone marrow lesions in knee osteoarthritis patients starting as early as 6 months after initiation of therapy: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study using MRI.

Authors:  Lukas Martin Wildi; Jean-Pierre Raynauld; Johanne Martel-Pelletier; André Beaulieu; Louis Bessette; Frédéric Morin; François Abram; Marc Dorais; Jean-Pierre Pelletier
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Study of osteoarthritis treatment with anti-inflammatory drugs: cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor and steroids.

Authors:  Hongsik Cho; Andrew Walker; Jeb Williams; Karen A Hasty
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Chondroitin sulfate efficacy versus celecoxib on knee osteoarthritis structural changes using magnetic resonance imaging: a 2-year multicentre exploratory study.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Pelletier; Jean-Pierre Raynauld; André D Beaulieu; Louis Bessette; Frédéric Morin; Artur J de Brum-Fernandes; Philippe Delorme; Marc Dorais; Patrice Paiement; François Abram; Johanne Martel-Pelletier
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 5.156

7.  Clinical effect of intramuscular calcitonin compared with oral celecoxib in the treatment of knee bone marrow lesions: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Jiaming Zhou; Wuyi Xiong; Pengguo Gou; Zhao Chen; Xing Guo; Xiaoyang Huo; Yuan Xue
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 8.  Advanced Imaging in Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Qi Li; Keiko Amano; Thomas M Link; C Benjamin Ma
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.843

9.  Levels of serum biomarkers from a two-year multicentre trial are associated with treatment response on knee osteoarthritis cartilage loss as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Johanne Martel-Pelletier; Jean-Pierre Raynauld; François Mineau; François Abram; Patrice Paiement; Philippe Delorme; Jean-Pierre Pelletier
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 5.156

10.  Impact of oral osteoarthritis therapy usage among other risk factors on knee replacement: a nested case-control study using the Osteoarthritis Initiative cohort.

Authors:  Marc Dorais; Johanne Martel-Pelletier; Jean-Pierre Raynauld; Philippe Delorme; Jean-Pierre Pelletier
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 5.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.