BACKGROUND: Government policy is to encourage self-help among patients. The internet is increasingly being used for health information. The literature on the role of the internet in the doctor-patient consultation remains sparse. AIM: To determine the perceived responses of GPs to internet-informed patients in consultations and the strategies GPs use for dealing with information from the internet being brought into consultations. DESIGN OF STUDY: A qualitative study design was used, with semi-structured interviews. SETTING: GPs based in North Central London. METHOD: Analysis was conducted by a multidisciplinary team of researchers. Participants were 11 GPs: five partners, three locums, and three salaried doctors; seven were white, three were Asian, and one was of Chinese origin. The median year of General Medical Council (GMC) registration was 1989. There were six women and five men; five participants worked in training practices. RESULTS: GPs experienced considerable anxiety in response to patients bringing information from the internet to a consultation but were able to resolve this anxiety. The study participants learned to distance themselves from their emotional response, and used cognitive and behavioural techniques to assist them in responding appropriately to patients. These techniques included buying time in a consultation, learning from previous consultations, and using the internet as an ally, by directing patients to particular websites. The importance for doctors of feeling valued by patients was apparent, as was the effect of the prior doctor-patient relationship. CONCLUSION: GPs interviewed used sophisticated mechanisms for dealing with their emotions. GPs struggling with internet-informed patients can use the mechanisms described to alleviate the difficulties.
BACKGROUND: Government policy is to encourage self-help among patients. The internet is increasingly being used for health information. The literature on the role of the internet in the doctor-patient consultation remains sparse. AIM: To determine the perceived responses of GPs to internet-informed patients in consultations and the strategies GPs use for dealing with information from the internet being brought into consultations. DESIGN OF STUDY: A qualitative study design was used, with semi-structured interviews. SETTING: GPs based in North Central London. METHOD: Analysis was conducted by a multidisciplinary team of researchers. Participants were 11 GPs: five partners, three locums, and three salaried doctors; seven were white, three were Asian, and one was of Chinese origin. The median year of General Medical Council (GMC) registration was 1989. There were six women and five men; five participants worked in training practices. RESULTS: GPs experienced considerable anxiety in response to patients bringing information from the internet to a consultation but were able to resolve this anxiety. The study participants learned to distance themselves from their emotional response, and used cognitive and behavioural techniques to assist them in responding appropriately to patients. These techniques included buying time in a consultation, learning from previous consultations, and using the internet as an ally, by directing patients to particular websites. The importance for doctors of feeling valued by patients was apparent, as was the effect of the prior doctor-patient relationship. CONCLUSION: GPs interviewed used sophisticated mechanisms for dealing with their emotions. GPs struggling with internet-informed patients can use the mechanisms described to alleviate the difficulties.
Authors: Genni M Newnham; W Ivon Burns; Raymond D Snyder; Anthony J Dowling; Nadia F Ranieri; Emma L Gray; Sue-Anne McLachlan Journal: Med J Aust Date: 2005-08-15 Impact factor: 7.738
Authors: Elizabeth Murray; Bernard Lo; Lance Pollack; Karen Donelan; Joe Catania; Ken Lee; Kinga Zapert; Rachel Turner Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2003-08-29 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Jordy Mehawej; Ajay Mishra; Jane S Saczynski; Molly E Waring; Darleen Lessard; Hawa O Abu; Vincent La; Mayra Tisminetzky; Khanh-Van Tran; Essa Hariri; Andreas Filippaios; Tenes Paul; Apurv Soni; Weijia Wang; Eric Y Ding; Benita A Bamgbade; Joanne Mathew; Catarina Kiefe; Robert J Goldberg; David D McManus Journal: Cardiovasc Digit Health J Date: 2022-03-11
Authors: Miriam Santer; Ingrid Muller; Lucy Yardley; Hana Burgess; Steven J Ersser; Sue Lewis-Jones; Paul Little Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2015-04-08 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Anne Townsend; Jenny Leese; Paul Adam; Michael McDonald; Linda C Li; Sheila Kerr; Catherine L Backman Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2015-06-22 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Melanie de Looper; Julia C M van Weert; Barbara C Schouten; Sifra Bolle; Eric H J Belgers; Eric H Eddes; Ellen M A Smets Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-07-05 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Maja Wilhelmsen; Ragnhild Sørensen Høifødt; Nils Kolstrup; Knut Waterloo; Martin Eisemann; Richard Chenhall; Mette Bech Risør Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2014-09-10 Impact factor: 5.428