BACKGROUND: This paper investigates knowledge of Community Health Insurance (CHI) and the perception of its relevance by key policy makers and health service managers in Uganda. Community Health Insurance schemes currently operate in the private-not-for-profit sector, in settings where church-based facilities function. They operate in a wider policy environment where user fees in the public sector have been abolished. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted during the second half of 2007 with District Health Officers (DHOs) and senior staff of the Ministry of Health (MOH). The qualitative data collected were analyzed using the framework method, facilitated by EZ-Text software. RESULTS: There is poor knowledge and understanding of CHI activities by staff of the MOH headquarters and DHOs. However, a comparison of responses reveals a relatively high level of awareness of CHI principles among DHOs compared to that of MOH staff. All the DHOs in the districts with schemes had a good understanding of CHI principles compared to DHOs in districts without schemes. Out-of-pocket expenditure remains an important feature of health care financing in Uganda despite blanket abolition of user fees in government facilities. CONCLUSION: CHI is perceived as a relevant policy option and potential source of funds for health care. It is also considered a means of raising the quality of health care in both public and private health units. To assess whether it is also feasible to introduce CHI in the public sector, there is an urgent need to investigate the willingness and readiness of stakeholders, in particular high level political authorities, to follow this new path. The current ambiguity and contradictions in the health financing policy of the Uganda MOH need to be addressed and clarified.
BACKGROUND: This paper investigates knowledge of Community Health Insurance (CHI) and the perception of its relevance by key policy makers and health service managers in Uganda. Community Health Insurance schemes currently operate in the private-not-for-profit sector, in settings where church-based facilities function. They operate in a wider policy environment where user fees in the public sector have been abolished. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted during the second half of 2007 with District Health Officers (DHOs) and senior staff of the Ministry of Health (MOH). The qualitative data collected were analyzed using the framework method, facilitated by EZ-Text software. RESULTS: There is poor knowledge and understanding of CHI activities by staff of the MOH headquarters and DHOs. However, a comparison of responses reveals a relatively high level of awareness of CHI principles among DHOs compared to that of MOH staff. All the DHOs in the districts with schemes had a good understanding of CHI principles compared to DHOs in districts without schemes. Out-of-pocket expenditure remains an important feature of health care financing in Uganda despite blanket abolition of user fees in government facilities. CONCLUSION: CHI is perceived as a relevant policy option and potential source of funds for health care. It is also considered a means of raising the quality of health care in both public and private health units. To assess whether it is also feasible to introduce CHI in the public sector, there is an urgent need to investigate the willingness and readiness of stakeholders, in particular high level political authorities, to follow this new path. The current ambiguity and contradictions in the health financing policy of the Uganda MOH need to be addressed and clarified.
Authors: Bart Criel; Alpha Ahmadou Diallo; Jean Van der Vennet; Maria-Pia Waelkens; Axel Wiegandt Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Martin Eckhardt; Siw Carlfjord; Tomas Faresjö; Antonio Crespo-Burgos; Birger C Forsberg; Magnus Falk Journal: Inquiry Date: 2019 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 1.730
Authors: Robert Basaza; Elizabeth P Kyasiimire; Prossy K Namyalo; Angela Kawooya; Proscovia Nnamulondo; Kon Paul Alier Journal: Risk Manag Healthc Policy Date: 2019-07-19
Authors: Tom Kakaire; Walter Schlech; Alex Coutinho; Richard Brough; Rosalind Parkes-Ratanshi Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-08-27 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: David Mark Dror; S A Shahed Hossain; Atanu Majumdar; Tracey Lynn Pérez Koehlmoos; Denny John; Pradeep Kumar Panda Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-08-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Racha Fadlallah; Fadi El-Jardali; Nour Hemadi; Rami Z Morsi; Clara Abou Abou Samra; Ali Ahmad; Khurram Arif; Lama Hishi; Gladys Honein-AbouHaidar; Elie A Akl Journal: Int J Equity Health Date: 2018-01-29