Literature DB >> 20132371

Consequences of 'load-lightening' for future indirect fitness gains by helpers in a cooperatively breeding bird.

Jessica Meade1, Ki-Baek Nam, Andrew P Beckerman, Ben J Hatchwell.   

Abstract

1. Helpers that invest energy in provisioning the offspring of related individuals stand to gain indirect fitness benefits from doing so. First, if the helper's effort is additional to that of the parents (additive) the productivity of the current breeding attempt can be increased. Secondly, if the parents reduce their workload (compensation) this can result in future indirect fitness gains to the helper via increased breeder survival; termed 'load-lightening'. 2. Long-tailed tits (Aegithalos caudatus) have a cooperative breeding system in which helpers assist kin and parents exhibit both additive and compensatory reactions in the presence of helpers. Offspring from helped nests are heavier and more likely to recruit into the breeding population, thus helpers gain indirect fitness benefits from increasing the productivity of the current breeding attempt. Despite breeders' reduction of feeding effort in the presence of helpers, previous investigations found no subsequent increase in breeder survival. 3. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that load-lightening resulted in indirect fitness benefits for helpers. We used data from a 14-year study to investigate the provisioning rate, survival and future fecundity of male and female long-tailed tits that did and did not receive help at the nest. 4. We found an asymmetrical response to the presence of helpers at large brood sizes. Males reduced their feeding rate more than females, and this differential response was reflected in a significant increase in male survival when provisioning large broods assisted by helpers. We found no evidence of any increase in future fecundity for helped breeders. 5. The finding that males reduce their provisioning rate in the presence of helpers (at large brood sizes) to a greater degree than females, and that this is reflected in an increase in survival rate for males only, implies that the survival increase is caused by the reduction in work-rate rather than a non-specific benefit of a larger group size. 6. The marginal benefits of help for breeder survival are likely to be more difficult to identify than the increased productivity at helped nests, but should not be overlooked when investigating the potential indirect fitness gains that supernumeraries can accrue by helping.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20132371     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01656.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  13 in total

1.  Kinship affects investment by helpers in a cooperatively breeding bird.

Authors:  Ki-Baek Nam; Michelle Simeoni; Stuart P Sharp; Ben J Hatchwell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Early and adult social environments have independent effects on individual fitness in a social vertebrate.

Authors:  Vérane Berger; Jean-François Lemaître; Dominique Allainé; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Aurélie Cohas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Models of social evolution: can we do better to predict 'who helps whom to achieve what'?

Authors:  António M M Rodrigues; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Inclusive fitness consequences of dispersal decisions in a cooperatively breeding bird, the long-tailed tit (Aegithalos caudatus).

Authors:  Jonathan P Green; Ben J Hatchwell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Component, group and demographic Allee effects in a cooperatively breeding bird species, the Arabian babbler (Turdoides squamiceps).

Authors:  Oded Keynan; Amanda R Ridley
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  A model explaining the matrilateral bias in alloparental investment.

Authors:  Gretchen Perry; Martin Daly
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  High temperatures drive offspring mortality in a cooperatively breeding bird.

Authors:  Amanda R Bourne; Susan J Cunningham; Claire N Spottiswoode; Amanda R Ridley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Antagonistic effect of helpers on breeding male and female survival in a cooperatively breeding bird.

Authors:  Matthieu Paquet; Claire Doutrelant; Ben J Hatchwell; Claire N Spottiswoode; Rita Covas
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 5.091

9.  Social genetic and social environment effects on parental and helper care in a cooperatively breeding bird.

Authors:  Mark James Adams; Matthew R Robinson; Maria-Elena Mannarelli; Ben J Hatchwell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Helping in cooperatively breeding long-tailed tits: a test of Hamilton's rule.

Authors:  Ben J Hatchwell; Philippa R Gullett; Mark J Adams
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.