Literature DB >> 20132361

Development and internal validation of a nomogram predicting extracapsular extension in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Naoya Satake1, Makoto Ohori, Changhong Yu, Michael W Kattan, Yoshio Ohno, Ayako Miyakawa, Tadashi Hatano, Masaaki Tachibana.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To present a nomogram predicting the side-specific probability of extracapsular extension (ECE) in radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens.
METHODS: Three hundred and fifty-four patients with T1c-T3a prostate cancer undergoing RP were included in the analysis. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was carried out to evaluate the predictive values of each clinical and pathological factor, separately and in combination. Based on logistic regression analysis, a nomogram predicting the side-specific probability of ECE was developed.
RESULTS: Overall, 146 (40%) of 354 patients and 165 (23%) of 708 lobes had ECE pathologically. The areas under the ROC curve (AUC) of the standard features, such as serum PSA, clinical stage and biopsy Gleason sum on each side, in predicting side-specific probability of ECE were 0.624, 0.627, and 0.747, respectively. When these three features were combined, AUC increased to 0.773 which was not significantly different from 0.791 of maximum percent of cancer alone (P = 0.613) and significantly enhanced by including maximum percent of cancer on each side, 0.799 (P = 0.022). The resulting nomogram was internally validated and had excellent calibration.
CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy in predicting ECE is increased by combining standard clinical factors (clinical stage, serum PSA, highest Gleason score) and biopsy features, such as maximum percent of cancer in the cores. The developed nomogram is helpful when deciding whether or not neurovascular bundles can be preserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20132361     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2010.02452.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Urol        ISSN: 0919-8172            Impact factor:   3.369


  6 in total

Review 1.  Image guidance in the focal treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anthony N Hoang; Dmitry Volkin; Nitin K Yerram; Srinivas Vourganti; Jeffrey Nix; W Marston Linehan; Bradford Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.309

2.  Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging for predicting pathologic T3 disease in Gleason score 7 prostate cancer: implications for prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Thomas J Pugh; Steven J Frank; Mary Achim; Deborah A Kuban; Andrew K Lee; Karen E Hoffman; Sean E McGuire; David A Swanson; Rajat Kudchadker; John W Davis
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Predicting side-specific prostate cancer extracapsular extension: a simple decision rule of PSA, biopsy, and MRI parameters.

Authors:  Piotr Zapała; Bartosz Dybowski; Ewa Bres-Niewada; Tomasz Lorenc; Agnieszka Powała; Zbigniew Lewandowski; Marek Gołębiowski; Piotr Radziszewski
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Development of an Indian nomogram for predicting extracapsular extension in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Chandran Ravi; Kalavampara V Sanjeevan; Appu Thomas; Ginil Kumar Pooleri
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2021-01-01

5.  External validation of a magnetic resonance imaging-based algorithm for prediction of side-specific extracapsular extension in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Piotr Zapała; Mieszko Kozikowski; Bartosz Dybowski; Łukasz Zapała; Jakub Dobruch; Piotr Radziszewski
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2021-09-18

6.  Development and comparison of a Chinese nomogram adding multi-parametric MRI information for predicting extracapsular extension of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yuke Chen; Wei Yu; Yu Fan; Liqun Zhou; Yang Yang; Huihui Wang; Yuan Jiang; Xiaoying Wang; Shiliang Wu; Jie Jin
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-03-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.