Literature DB >> 2013211

Comparative antimicrobial spectrum and activity of ceftibuten against clinical isolates from West Germany.

A Bauernfeind1.   

Abstract

The in vitro activity of a new oral cephalosporin, ceftibuten, was determined against 837 clinical isolates by agar dilution technique and compared with that of the oral cephalosporins, cefaclor, cefuroxime, cefixime, cefpodoxime, and cefprozil. Against Enterobacteriaceae, ceftibuten was the most active of the compounds. Ceftibuten MIC90s were less than or equal to 0.25 micrograms/ml for most members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, 0.13 microgram/ml for Haemophilus influenzae, 4 micrograms/ml for Moraxella catarrhalis, and 0.5 microgram/ml for Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Ceftibuten also was active against beta-haemolytic streptococci (serogroups A, C, and G) and penicillin-susceptible strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae (MIC90, 4 micrograms/ml), but was not active against Staphylococcus spp. or the anaerobic bacteria studied. Cefpodoxime and cefuroxime were the most active of the cephalosporins against nonenteric streptococci; cefprozil and cefuroxime were the most active against staphylococci, and cefaclor demonstrated the greatest activity against some Bacteroides spp. Most strains of Acinetobacter baumanii, Pseudomonas spp., and methicillin-resistant staphylococci, as well as all strains of Clostridium difficile, were resistant to each of the cephalosporins tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2013211     DOI: 10.1016/0732-8893(91)90091-s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  13 in total

1.  In vitro activity of RU 29246, the active compound of the cephalosporin prodrug ester HR 916.

Authors:  G Riess; J Andrews; D Thornber; R Wise
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Clinical and economic considerations in the use of third-generation oral cephalosporins.

Authors:  S T Chambers; D R Murdoch; M J Pearce
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  [Antibacterial activity and beta-lactamase stability of eleven oral cephalosporins].

Authors:  A Bauernfeind; R Jungwirth; S Schweighart; M Theopold
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.553

4.  Ceftibuten concentrations in human tonsillar tissue.

Authors:  F Scaglione; J P Pintucci; G Demartini; S Dugnani
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of ceftibuten in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  C Lin; E Radwanski; M Affrime; M N Cayen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Pharmacokinetics and dose proportionality of ceftibuten in men.

Authors:  C Lin; J Lim; E Radwanski; A Marco; M Affrime
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Cefprozil. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential.

Authors:  L R Wiseman; P Benfield
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Ceftibuten pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Focus on paediatric use.

Authors:  G L Kearns; R A Young
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Antibacterial activity of cefpodoxime in comparison with cefixime, cefdinir, cefetamet, ceftibuten, loracarbef, cefprozil, BAY 3522, cefuroxime, cefaclor and cefadroxil.

Authors:  A Bauernfeind; R Jungwirth
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 10.  Future directions in antimicrobial chemotherapy.

Authors:  R Janknegt
Journal:  Pharm Weekbl Sci       Date:  1992-08-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.