Literature DB >> 20131376

Feature space resampling for protein conformational search.

Ben Blum1, Michael I Jordan, David Baker.   

Abstract

De novo protein structure prediction requires location of the lowest energy state of the polypeptide chain among a vast set of possible conformations. Powerful approaches include conformational space annealing, in which search progressively focuses on the most promising regions of conformational space, and genetic algorithms, in which features of the best conformations thus far identified are recombined. We describe a new approach that combines the strengths of these two approaches. Protein conformations are projected onto a discrete feature space which includes backbone torsion angles, secondary structure, and beta pairings. For each of these there is one "native" value: the one found in the native structure. We begin with a large number of conformations generated in independent Monte Carlo structure prediction trajectories from Rosetta. Native values for each feature are predicted from the frequencies of feature value occurrences and the energy distribution in conformations containing them. A second round of structure prediction trajectories are then guided by the predicted native feature distributions. We show that native features can be predicted at much higher than background rates, and that using the predicted feature distributions improves structure prediction in a benchmark of 28 proteins. The advantages of our approach are that features from many different input structures can be combined simultaneously without producing atomic clashes or otherwise physically inviable models, and that the features being recombined have a relatively high chance of being correct. 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20131376      PMCID: PMC2854516          DOI: 10.1002/prot.22677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  14 in total

1.  Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices.

Authors:  D T Jones
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-09-17       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Efficient, multiple-range random walk algorithm to calculate the density of states.

Authors:  F Wang; D P Landau
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2001-03-05       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Coupled prediction of protein secondary and tertiary structure.

Authors:  Jens Meiler; David Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Improving protein structure prediction with model-based search.

Authors:  T J Brunette; Oliver Brock
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Improved beta-protein structure prediction by multilevel optimization of nonlocal strand pairings and local backbone conformation.

Authors:  Philip Bradley; David Baker
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-12-01

Review 6.  Macromolecular modeling with rosetta.

Authors:  Rhiju Das; David Baker
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 23.643

7.  Hidden Markov models for detecting remote protein homologies.

Authors:  K Karplus; C Barrett; R Hughey
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins.

Authors:  K W Plaxco; K T Simons; D Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1998-04-10       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Protein folding simulation with genetic algorithm and supersecondary structure constraints.

Authors:  Y Cui; R S Chen; W H Wong
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1998-05-15

10.  Ab initio structure prediction for small polypeptides and protein fragments using genetic algorithms.

Authors:  J T Pedersen; J Moult
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1995-11
View more
  6 in total

1.  Profile of Michael I. Jordan.

Authors:  Nicholette Zeliadt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Chemical shift-based methods in NMR structure determination.

Authors:  Santrupti Nerli; Andrew C McShan; Nikolaos G Sgourakis
Journal:  Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc       Date:  2018-03-11       Impact factor: 9.795

3.  A probabilistic fragment-based protein structure prediction algorithm.

Authors:  David Simoncini; Francois Berenger; Rojan Shrestha; Kam Y J Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Resolution-adapted recombination of structural features significantly improves sampling in restraint-guided structure calculation.

Authors:  Oliver F Lange; David Baker
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2012-03

5.  Combining physicochemical and evolutionary information for protein contact prediction.

Authors:  Michael Schneider; Oliver Brock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Enhancing fragment-based protein structure prediction by customising fragment cardinality according to local secondary structure.

Authors:  Jad Abbass; Jean-Christophe Nebel
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.