Literature DB >> 20131284

Management of nonresponse to rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis: predictors and outcome of re-treatment.

E M Vital1, S Dass, A C Rawstron, M H Buch, V Goëb, K Henshaw, F Ponchel, P Emery.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A proportion of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have disease that fails to respond to an initial cycle of rituximab. Using highly sensitive flow cytometry (HSFC), it has been shown that most patients who do not exhibit a response, as measured using the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria, have persistent circulating B cell levels at week 2 after initial treatment with rituximab. This study was undertaken to examine whether an additional cycle of rituximab would improve B cell depletion and clinical response in patients whose disease did not respond to the initial cycle.
METHODS: Patients with RA (n = 158) were treated with a first cycle of rituximab (2 infusions of 1 gm each). Clinical responses were assessed using EULAR criteria, and patients were categorized as either first-cycle responders or first-cycle nonresponders. Baseline characteristics of first-cycle nonresponders (n = 38) and first-cycle responders (n = 65) with complete data were compared. First-cycle nonresponders (n = 25) were treated with a second cycle of rituximab at least 6 months after the first cycle. HSFC was performed at baseline, immediately prior to the second infusion (week 2), 1 month after the second infusion (week 6), and then every 3 months for each cycle of rituximab. Complete B cell depletion was defined as being <0.0001 x 10(9) cells/liter.
RESULTS: At baseline, the number of preplasma cells was significantly higher in first-cycle nonresponders than in first-cycle responders (P = 0.003). Following the first infusion of the first cycle of rituximab, only 9% of first-cycle nonresponders (3 of 34) exhibited complete depletion of B-lineage cells, compared with 37% of first-cycle responders (22 of 59) (P = 0.007). Following the first infusion of the second cycle of rituximab, 38% of first-cycle nonresponders exhibited complete depletion. Twenty-six weeks after the second cycle, there was a significant improvement in the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, with 72% of patients exhibiting a EULAR response.
CONCLUSION: RA patients whose disease did not respond to an initial cycle of rituximab have higher circulating preplasma cell numbers at baseline and incomplete depletion. Our findings indicate that an additional cycle of rituximab administered prior to total B cell repopulation enhances B cell depletion and clinical responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20131284     DOI: 10.1002/art.27359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  34 in total

Review 1.  A comprehensive review of rituximab therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Authors:  Soheil Tavakolpour; Samira Alesaeidi; Mohammad Darvishi; Mojtaba GhasemiAdl; Sahar Darabi-Monadi; Meisam Akhlaghdoust; Somayeh Elikaei Behjati; Arash Jafarieh
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 2.  Immune cell profiling to guide therapeutic decisions in rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  Joerg Ermann; Deepak A Rao; Nikola C Teslovich; Michael B Brenner; Soumya Raychaudhuri
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 3.  Rheumatoid arthritis and the era of biologic therapy.

Authors:  Anshuman P Malaviya; Andrew J K Ostör
Journal:  Inflammopharmacology       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 4.473

4.  Autoantibodies From Single Circulating Plasmablasts React With Citrullinated Antigens and Porphyromonas gingivalis in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Song Li; Yangsheng Yu; Yinshi Yue; Hongyan Liao; Wanqin Xie; Jessica Thai; Ted R Mikuls; Geoffrey M Thiele; Michael J Duryee; Harlan Sayles; Jeffrey B Payne; Lynell W Klassen; James R O'Dell; Zhixin Zhang; Kaihong Su
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 10.995

Review 5.  Liquid biopsies to guide therapeutic decisions in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Roxana Coras; Rekha Narasimhan; Monica Guma
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 7.012

Review 6.  The problem of choice: current biologic agents and future prospects in RA.

Authors:  Ernest H Choy; Arthur F Kavanaugh; Simon A Jones
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 20.543

7.  Usefulness of monitoring of B cell depletion in rituximab-treated rheumatoid arthritis patients in order to predict clinical relapse: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  A-P Trouvin; S Jacquot; S Grigioni; E Curis; I Dedreux; A Roucheux; H Boulard; O Vittecoq; X Le Loët; O Boyer; V Goëb
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Current and future treatment approaches for neuromyelitis optica.

Authors:  Nicolas Collongues; Jérôme de Seze
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.570

Review 9.  Lymphocytes as Biomarkers of Therapeutic Response in Rheumatic Autoimmune Diseases, Is It a Realistic Goal?

Authors:  Kristina Schreiber; Gaetane Nocturne; Divi Cornec; Claire I Daïen
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 10.  An update on the evidence for the efficacy and safety of rituximab in the management of neuromyelitis optica.

Authors:  Nicolas Collongues; Jérôme de Seze
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 6.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.