INTRODUCTION: Since progressive hemorrhagic injury (PHI) was introduced in neurosurgical literatures, several studies have been performed, the results of which have influenced doctors but do not define guidelines for the best treatment of PHI. PHI may be confirmed by a serial computerized tomography (CT) scan, and it has been shown to be associated with a fivefold increase in the risk of clinical worsening and is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality as well. So, early detection of PHI is practically important in a clinical situation. METHODS: To analyze the early CT signs of progressive hemorrhagic injury following acute traumatic brain injury (TBI) and explore their clinical significances, PHI was confirmed by comparing the first and repeated CT scans. Data were analyzed and compared including times from injury to the first CT and signs of the early CT scan. Logistic regression analysis was used to show the risk factors related to PHI. RESULTS: A cohort of 630 TBI patients was evaluated, and there were 189 (30%) patients who suffered from PHI. For patients with their first CT scan obtained as early as 2 h post-injury, there were 116 (77.25%) cases who suffered from PHI. The differences between PHIs and non-PHIs were significant in the initial CT scans showing fracture, subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), brain contusion, epidural hematoma (EDH), subdural hematoma (SDH), and multiple hematoma as well as the times from injury to the first CT scan (P < 0.01). Logistic regression analysis showed that early CT scans (EDH, SDH, SAH, fracture, and brain contusion) were predictors of PHI (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: For patients with the first CT scan obtained as early as 2 h post-injury, a follow-up CT scan should be performed promptly. If the initial CT scan shows SAH, brain contusion, and primary hematoma with brain swelling, an earlier and dynamic CT scan should be performed for detection of PHI as early as possible and the medical intervention would be enforced in time.
INTRODUCTION: Since progressive hemorrhagic injury (PHI) was introduced in neurosurgical literatures, several studies have been performed, the results of which have influenced doctors but do not define guidelines for the best treatment of PHI. PHI may be confirmed by a serial computerized tomography (CT) scan, and it has been shown to be associated with a fivefold increase in the risk of clinical worsening and is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality as well. So, early detection of PHI is practically important in a clinical situation. METHODS: To analyze the early CT signs of progressive hemorrhagic injury following acute traumatic brain injury (TBI) and explore their clinical significances, PHI was confirmed by comparing the first and repeated CT scans. Data were analyzed and compared including times from injury to the first CT and signs of the early CT scan. Logistic regression analysis was used to show the risk factors related to PHI. RESULTS: A cohort of 630 TBIpatients was evaluated, and there were 189 (30%) patients who suffered from PHI. For patients with their first CT scan obtained as early as 2 h post-injury, there were 116 (77.25%) cases who suffered from PHI. The differences between PHIs and non-PHIs were significant in the initial CT scans showing fracture, subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), brain contusion, epidural hematoma (EDH), subdural hematoma (SDH), and multiple hematoma as well as the times from injury to the first CT scan (P < 0.01). Logistic regression analysis showed that early CT scans (EDH, SDH, SAH, fracture, and brain contusion) were predictors of PHI (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: For patients with the first CT scan obtained as early as 2 h post-injury, a follow-up CT scan should be performed promptly. If the initial CT scan shows SAH, brain contusion, and primary hematoma with brain swelling, an earlier and dynamic CT scan should be performed for detection of PHI as early as possible and the medical intervention would be enforced in time.
Authors: Matthias Oertel; Daniel F Kelly; David McArthur; W John Boscardin; Thomas C Glenn; Jae Hong Lee; Tooraj Gravori; Dennis Obukhov; Duncan Q McBride; Neil A Martin Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Raj K Narayan; Andrew I R Maas; Franco Servadei; Brett E Skolnick; Michael N Tillinger; Lawrence F Marshall Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Randall Z Allison; Kazuma Nakagawa; Michael Hayashi; Daniel J Donovan; Matthew A Koenig Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: L Letourneau-Guillon; T Huynh; R Jakobovic; R Milwid; S P Symons; R I Aviv Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-10-18 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Timothy E Sweeney; Arghavan Salles; Odette A Harris; David A Spain; Kristan L Staudenmayer Journal: World J Emerg Surg Date: 2015-06-06 Impact factor: 5.469
Authors: Ruchira M Jha; Stefania Mondello; Helen M Bramlett; C Edward Dixon; Deborah A Shear; W Dalton Dietrich; Kevin K W Wang; Zhihui Yang; Ronald L Hayes; Samuel M Poloyac; Philip E Empey; Audrey D Lafrenaye; Hong Q Yan; Shaun W Carlson; John T Povlishock; Janice S Gilsdorf; Patrick M Kochanek Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2020-12-18 Impact factor: 5.269