Literature DB >> 20131015

Downstaging without complete pathologic response after neoadjuvant treatment improves cancer outcomes for cIII but not cII rectal cancers.

Luiz Felipe de Campos-Lobato1, Luca Stocchi, Andre da Luz Moreira, Matthew F Kalady, Daniel Geisler, David Dietz, Ian C Lavery, Feza H Remzi, Victor W Fazio.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether downstaging impacts prognosis in patients with cII versus cIII rectal cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified from our colorectal cancer database 295 patients with primary cII and cIII rectal cancer staged by CT and ERUS/MRI who received 5-FU-based chemoradiation followed by R0 surgery after a median interval of 7 weeks during 1997-2007. The median radiotherapy dose was 5040 cGy. We excluded 58 patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) and compared among the remaining 162 patients pathologic downstaging (cII to ypI, cIII to ypII or ypI) versus no pathologic downstaging (c stage < or = yp stage). Outcomes evaluated were 5-year overall survival, 3-year cancer-specific survival, disease-free survival, overall recurrence, local recurrence, and distant recurrence.
RESULTS: The median age was 58 years and median follow-up was 48 months. Patients with downstaging versus no downstaging were statistically comparable with respect to demographics, chemoradiation regimen, interval time between neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery, tumor distance from anal verge, surgical procedures performed, and follow-up time. With the exception of local recurrence rates, downstaging resulted in significantly improved cancer outcomes for cIII but not cII.
CONCLUSIONS: Downstaging without pCR is a significant prognostic factor for patients with stage cIII rectal cancer. Tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation should be taken into account when defining the optimal adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with cIII rectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20131015     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-0924-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  18 in total

Review 1.  Interval to surgery after neoadjuvant treatment for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nir Wasserberg
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Oncologic results and prognostic predictors of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer showing ypN0 after radical surgery following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Kyung-Ha Lee; Jae-Chan Kim; Ji-Yeon Kim; Jin-Su Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Neoadjuvant vs adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: Which is superior?

Authors:  Sarah Popek; Vassiliki Liana Tsikitis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Predictive markers of chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: comparison of biopsy specimens taken before and about 1 week after the start of chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Suzuki; Sotaro Sadahiro; Akira Tanaka; Kazutake Okada; Gota Saito; Akemi Kamijo; Takeshi Akiba; Shuichi Kawada
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Thymidylate synthase genotype-directed neoadjuvant chemoradiation for patients with rectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Benjamin R Tan; Fabienne Thomas; Robert J Myerson; Barbara Zehnbauer; Kathryn Trinkaus; Robert S Malyapa; Matthew G Mutch; Elliot E Abbey; Amer Alyasiry; James W Fleshman; Howard L McLeod
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Relations of Changes in Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels before and after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and after Surgery to Histologic Response and Outcomes in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Gota Saito; Sotaro Sadahiro; Takashi Ogimi; Hiroshi Miyakita; Kazutake Okada; Akira Tanaka; Toshiyuki Suzuki
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 2.935

7.  Kinetically guided neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy based on 5-Fluorouracil in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jiří Grim; Miloš Hroch; Hroch Miloš; Jaroslav Chládek; Chládek Jaroslav; Jiří Petera; Petera Jiří; Jiřina Martínková; Martínková Jiřina
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  A Modified Classification of Prognostic Factors Based on Pathological Stage and Tumor Regression Grade in Patients with Rectal Cancer Who Receive Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Suzuki; Sotaro Sadahiro; Akira Tanaka; Kazutake Okada; Gota Saito; Hiroshi Miyakita; Takeshi Akiba; Hiroshi Yamamuro
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 2.935

9.  Neoadjuvant oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  D Greto; F Paiar; C Saieva; A Galardi; M Mangoni; L Livi; B Agresti; D Franceschini; P Bonomo; V Scotti; B Detti; F Tonelli; A Valeri; L Messerini; G Biti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Watch and Wait?--Elevated Pretreatment CEA Is Associated with Decreased Pathological Complete Response in Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Christian P Probst; Adan Z Becerra; Christopher T Aquina; Mohamedtaki A Tejani; Bradley J Hensley; Maynor G González; Katia Noyes; John R T Monson; Fergal J Fleming
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.