Literature DB >> 20130480

Clinical value of single versus composite provocative clinical tests in the assessment of painful shoulder.

Fausto Salaffi1, Alessandro Ciapetti, Marina Carotti, Stefania Gasparini, Emilio Filippucci, Walter Grassi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aims of the present study were to investigate the clinical value of the provocative clinical tests and propose a composite index for the assessment of painful shoulder, using ultrasonography (US) as reference method.
METHODS: Two hundred three patients with painful shoulder underwent both clinical and US evaluations. The physical examination was carried out performing the Hawkins, Jobe, Patte, Gerber, and Speed tests. Each test was included in a composite index namely, SNAPSHOT (Simple Numeric Assessment of Pain by SHOulder Tests). The US examination was performed by a rheumatologist experienced in US and blinded to clinical findings. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, positive and negative likelihood ratio of each clinical test were calculated. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the performance of the composite SNAPSHOT index.
RESULTS: Sensitivity was low for the clinical diagnosis of all shoulder abnormalities. The highest sensitivity and smallest negative likelihood ratio were found for the Hawkins (63.88% and 0.50%) and Patte (62.21% and 0.52%) tests. Specificity was good for Speed (76.33%), Gerber (75.42%), and Patte (74.20%) tests. Patte and Speed tests were the most accurate (71.12% and 66.41%, respectively). The calculated area under the ROC curve related to the SNAPSHOT composite index was 0.881 +/- 0.026. With an optimal cut-off point of 3, the sensitivity and specificity were 75.8% and 87.5%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The results of the present study showed that SNAPSHOT is a feasible, informative and quantitative composite index for the assessment of painful shoulder in the clinical setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20130480     DOI: 10.1097/RHU.0b013e3181cf8392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 1076-1608            Impact factor:   3.517


  4 in total

1.  Validation of clinical examination versus magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy for the detection of rotator cuff lesions.

Authors:  Andrew J K Ostör; Christine A Richards; Graham Tytherleigh-Strong; Philip W Bearcroft; A Toby Prevost; Cathy A Speed; Brian L Hazleman
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  The Diagnostic Accuracy of Special Tests for Rotator Cuff Tear: The ROW Cohort Study.

Authors:  Nitin B Jain; Jennifer Luz; Laurence D Higgins; Yan Dong; Jon J P Warner; Elizabeth Matzkin; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.159

Review 3.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Tests for Subscapularis Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexandre Lädermann; Philippe Collin; Olivia Zbinden; Timon Meynard; Mo Saffarini; Joe Chih-Hao Chiu
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-09-27

4.  Validation of the Simple Shoulder Test in a Portuguese-Brazilian population. Is the latent variable structure and validation of the Simple Shoulder Test Stable across cultures?

Authors:  Jose Osni Bruggemann Neto; Rafael Lehmkuhl Gesser; Valdir Steglich; Ana Paula Bonilauri Ferreira; Mihir Gandhi; João Ricardo Nickenig Vissoci; Ricardo Pietrobon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.