OBJECTIVES: To evaluate two enrichment broths for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) detection and compare results with direct plating. METHODS: Swabs from 1224 patients were re-analysed for MRSA in a central laboratory (Münster) using six methods. Swabs were suspended in 0.5 mL of non-selective enrichment broth (NB) and vortexed. Aliquots of 100 microL were inoculated on/into: (I) ChromID MRSA agar; (II) Columbia sheep blood (5%) agar (BA) and ChromID MRSA; (III, IV) NB incubated overnight followed by plating on BA and ChromID MRSA; and (V, VI) a semi-selective broth containing cefoxitin and aztreonam (TSB-SSI) incubated overnight followed by plating on BA and ChromID MRSA. In III-VI, 100 microL of the enriched broth was plated on each agar. RESULTS: The combined MRSA-positive rate was 21.5%. MRSA isolates detected by each method were: TSB-SSI, n = 223; NB, n = 205; BA and ChromID MRSA, n = 203; ChromID MRSA alone, n = 183. TSB-SSI detected more positive throat samples than the comparators and significantly reduced methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) growth. The maximum sensitivity obtained was only 85%, possibly due to the study design using pre-used swabs and dilution of swab material. For 997 samples, results from Münster were compared with initial results. Peripheral laboratories identified 172 MRSA compared with Münster where 186, 186 and 204 MRSA were found for direct plating, NB and TSB-SSI broth, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: TSB-SSI was superior to both NB and direct plating on ChromID MRSA and BA. Despite re-using swabs for the study, we showed that routine diagnostic screening could be significantly improved, using a semi-selective enrichment broth.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate two enrichment broths for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) detection and compare results with direct plating. METHODS: Swabs from 1224 patients were re-analysed for MRSA in a central laboratory (Münster) using six methods. Swabs were suspended in 0.5 mL of non-selective enrichment broth (NB) and vortexed. Aliquots of 100 microL were inoculated on/into: (I) ChromID MRSA agar; (II) Columbia sheep blood (5%) agar (BA) and ChromID MRSA; (III, IV) NB incubated overnight followed by plating on BA and ChromID MRSA; and (V, VI) a semi-selective broth containing cefoxitin and aztreonam (TSB-SSI) incubated overnight followed by plating on BA and ChromID MRSA. In III-VI, 100 microL of the enriched broth was plated on each agar. RESULTS: The combined MRSA-positive rate was 21.5%. MRSA isolates detected by each method were: TSB-SSI, n = 223; NB, n = 205; BA and ChromID MRSA, n = 203; ChromID MRSA alone, n = 183. TSB-SSI detected more positive throat samples than the comparators and significantly reduced methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) growth. The maximum sensitivity obtained was only 85%, possibly due to the study design using pre-used swabs and dilution of swab material. For 997 samples, results from Münster were compared with initial results. Peripheral laboratories identified 172 MRSA compared with Münster where 186, 186 and 204 MRSA were found for direct plating, NB and TSB-SSI broth, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:TSB-SSI was superior to both NB and direct plating on ChromID MRSA and BA. Despite re-using swabs for the study, we showed that routine diagnostic screening could be significantly improved, using a semi-selective enrichment broth.
Authors: M F Q Kluytmans-van den Bergh; M C Vos; B M W Diederen; C M J E Vandenbroucke-Grauls; A Voss; J A J W Kluytmans Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2013-07-27 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: T Stenholm; A J Hakanen; S Salmenlinna; S Pihlasalo; H Härmä; P E Hänninen; P Huovinen; J Vuopio; P Kotilainen Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2011-04-02 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: M F Q Kluytmans-van den Bergh; C Verhulst; L E Willemsen; E Verkade; M J M Bonten; J A J W Kluytmans Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2015-05-20 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Roel H T Nijhuis; Noortje M van Maarseveen; Erik J van Hannen; Anton A van Zwet; Ellen M Mascini Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2014-05-28 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Sarah Rhodes; Elizabeth Christenson; Allie Nguyen; Jesper Larsen; Lance B Price; Jill Stewart Journal: Environ Res Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Roméo Rocha Simões; Marta Aires-de-Sousa; Teresa Conceição; Filipa Antunes; Paulo Martins da Costa; Hermínia de Lencastre Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-03-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ricarda Sassmannshausen; Ruud H Deurenberg; Robin Köck; Ron Hendrix; Annette Jurke; John W A Rossen; Alexander W Friedrich Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2016-08-22 Impact factor: 5.640
Authors: Mathias Herrmann; Christine Petit; Alik Dawson; Judith Biechele; Alexander Halfmann; Lutz von Müller; Stefan Gräber; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Renate Klein; Barbara Gärtner Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-09-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Larissa Marques de Oliveira; Inneke Marie van der Heijden; George R Golding; Edson Abdala; Maristela P Freire; Flavia Rossi; Luiz C D' alburquerque; Anna S Levin; Silvia F Costa Journal: BMC Microbiol Date: 2015-11-14 Impact factor: 3.605