Literature DB >> 20129991

Reproductive constraints, direct fitness and indirect fitness benefits explain helping behaviour in the primitively eusocial wasp, Polistes canadensis.

Seirian Sumner1, Hans Kelstrup, Daniele Fanelli.   

Abstract

A key step in the evolution of sociality is the abandonment of independent breeding in favour of helping. In cooperatively breeding vertebrates and primitively eusocial insects, helpers are capable of leaving the group and reproducing independently, and yet many do not. A fundamental question therefore is why do helpers help? Helping behaviour may be explained by constraints on independent reproduction and/or benefits to individuals from helping. Here, we examine simultaneously the reproductive constraints and fitness benefits underlying helping behaviour in a primitively eusocial paper wasp. We gave 31 helpers the opportunity to become egg-layers on their natal nests by removing nestmates. This allowed us to determine whether helpers are reproductively constrained in any way. We found that age strongly influenced whether an ex-helper could become an egg-layer, such that young ex-helpers could become egg-layers while old ex-helpers were less able. These differential reproductive constraints enabled us to make predictions about the behaviours of ex-helpers, depending on the relative importance of direct and indirect fitness benefits. We found little evidence that indirect fitness benefits explain helping behaviour, as 71 per cent of ex-helpers left their nests before the end of the experiment. In the absence of reproductive constraints, however, young helpers value direct fitness opportunities over indirect fitness. We conclude that a combination of reproductive constraints and potential for future direct reproduction explain helping behaviour in this species. Testing several competing explanations for helping behaviour simultaneously promises to advance our understanding of social behaviour in animal groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20129991      PMCID: PMC2871861          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.2289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  23 in total

1.  Insurance-based advantages for subordinate co-foundresses in a temperate paper wasp.

Authors:  Gavin Shreeves; Michael A Cant; Alan Bolton; Jeremy Field
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Tug-of-war over reproduction in a social bee.

Authors:  Philipp Langer; Katja Hogendoorn; Laurent Keller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Future fitness and helping in social queues.

Authors:  Jeremy Field; Adam Cronin; Catherine Bridge
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Direct fitness, reciprocity and helping: a perspective from primitively eusocial wasps.

Authors:  Jeremy Field; Michael A Cant
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 5.  Evolutionary explanations for cooperation.

Authors:  Stuart A West; Ashleigh S Griffin; Andy Gardner
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Ancestral monogamy shows kin selection is key to the evolution of eusociality.

Authors:  William O H Hughes; Benjamin P Oldroyd; Madeleine Beekman; Francis L W Ratnieks
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Structure and function in mammalian societies.

Authors:  Tim Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 8.  Cooperation between non-kin in animal societies.

Authors:  Tim Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Partitioning of reproduction in animal societies.

Authors:  L Keller; H K Reeve
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 17.712

10.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I.

Authors:  W D Hamilton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 2.691

View more
  7 in total

1.  Workers influence royal reproduction.

Authors:  Richard J Gill; Robert L Hammond
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Current indirect fitness and future direct fitness are not incompatible.

Authors:  Anindita Brahma; Souvik Mandal; Raghavendra Gadagkar
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  The evolution of cooperative breeding by direct and indirect fitness effects.

Authors:  Irene García-Ruiz; Andrés Quiñones; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 14.957

4.  Transcriptome analyses of primitively eusocial wasps reveal novel insights into the evolution of sociality and the origin of alternative phenotypes.

Authors:  Pedro G Ferreira; Solenn Patalano; Ritika Chauhan; Richard Ffrench-Constant; Toni Gabaldón; Roderic Guigó; Seirian Sumner
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 13.583

5.  Molecular signatures of plastic phenotypes in two eusocial insect species with simple societies.

Authors:  Solenn Patalano; Anna Vlasova; Chris Wyatt; Philip Ewels; Francisco Camara; Pedro G Ferreira; Claire L Asher; Tomasz P Jurkowski; Anne Segonds-Pichon; Martin Bachman; Irene González-Navarrete; André E Minoche; Felix Krueger; Ernesto Lowy; Marina Marcet-Houben; Jose Luis Rodriguez-Ales; Fabio S Nascimento; Shankar Balasubramanian; Toni Gabaldon; James E Tarver; Simon Andrews; Heinz Himmelbauer; William O H Hughes; Roderic Guigó; Wolf Reik; Seirian Sumner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Do social insects support Haig's kin theory for the evolution of genomic imprinting?

Authors:  Mirko Pegoraro; Hollie Marshall; Zoë N Lonsdale; Eamonn B Mallon
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.528

7.  Differential gene expression and protein abundance evince ontogenetic bias toward castes in a primitively eusocial wasp.

Authors:  James H Hunt; Florian Wolschin; Michael T Henshaw; Thomas C Newman; Amy L Toth; Gro V Amdam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.