Literature DB >> 20129388

Immunoadsorption in SLE: three different high affinity columns are adequately effective in removing autoantibodies and controlling disease activity.

P Biesenbach1, S Schmaldienst, J S Smolen, W H Hörl, K Derfler, G H Stummvoll.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Pathogenic autoantibodies (Abs) are a hallmark of SLE and their rapid removal is beneficial in active SLE. Immunoadsorption (IAS) is effective in removing serum levels of all classes of immunoglobulin (Ig), immune complexes (IC) and anti-dsDNA Abs and appears superior to plasmapheresis with respect to side effects. IAS can be performed with different columns, which use different ligands to bind their target. In particular, high affinity columns are in the focus of interest. Their ligands are either sheep IgG directed against human Ig (Ig-column, Ig-Therasorb®), or staphylococcal Protein A (ProtA-column, Immunosorba®), or the synthetic peptide Gam146 (GAM-column, Globaffin®). In our experience Ig-columns have been effective in treating active renal SLE. However, no analysis has so far been published on which column type should be preferred in treating SLE patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among our SLE patients maintained on prolonged IAS therapy, we identified those with stable renal SLE and low to moderate disease activity who were successfully treated by using Ig-columns. Six of these patients were switched to ProtA-columns, keeping the rest of the protocol and the medication constant. In addition, two patients were switched from Ig- to GAM-columns.
RESULTS: All types of columns significantly lowered the serum levels of IgG, IgM, and anti-dsDNA Abs. Disease activity was constantly low before and after the switch, as were parameters of renal function. In addition, patients with highly active disease were effectively treated when ProtA- (n=6) or GAM-columns (n=1) were used as first-line extracorporeal treatment.
CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that all columns are adequately effective in controlling key parameters of SLE. Thus, it is not the type of the ligand, but only the outcome, i.e. the successful removal of Ig, IC, and (auto-) Abs that is required for controlling SLE activity.
Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20129388     DOI: 10.1016/S1567-5688(09)71824-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atheroscler Suppl        ISSN: 1567-5688            Impact factor:   3.235


  5 in total

1.  Rapid reduction of antibodies and improvement of disease activity by immunoadsorption in Chinese patients with severe systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Jinxian Huang; Guoxiang Song; Zhihua Yin; Weizhen He; Lijun Zhang; Weihong Kong; Zhizhong Ye
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 2.  Acute pancreatitis and macrophage activation syndrome in pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus: case-based review.

Authors:  Qiang Lin; Man Zhang; Hanyun Tang; Yunyan Shen; Yun Zhu; Qinying Xu; Xiaozhong Li
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2019-08-03       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  Performance, clinical effectiveness, and safety of immunoadsorption in a wide range of indications.

Authors:  Kornelius Fuchs; Silke Rummler; Wolfgang Ries; Matthias Helmschrott; Jochen Selbach; Friedlinde Ernst; Christian Morath; Adelheid Gauly; Saynab Atiye; Manuela Stauss-Grabo; Mareike Giefer
Journal:  Ther Apher Dial       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 2.195

4.  SARS-CoV-2 IgG spike protein antibody response in mRNA-1273 Moderna® vaccinated patients on maintenance immunoapheresis - a cohort study.

Authors:  Martina Gaggl; Constantin Aschauer; Christof Aigner; Gregor Bond; Andreas Vychytil; Robert Strassl; Ludwig Wagner; Gere Sunder-Plassmann; Alice Schmidt
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 8.786

5.  Long-term outcome of anti-glomerular basement membrane antibody disease treated with immunoadsorption.

Authors:  Peter Biesenbach; Renate Kain; Kurt Derfler; Thomas Perkmann; Afschin Soleiman; Alexandra Benharkou; Wilfred Druml; Andrew Rees; Marcus D Säemann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.