Literature DB >> 20128631

A review of the in vivo and in vitro toxicity of silver and gold particulates: particle attributes and biological mechanisms responsible for the observed toxicity.

Helinor J Johnston1, Gary Hutchison, Frans M Christensen, Sheona Peters, Steve Hankin, Vicki Stone.   

Abstract

This review is concerned with evaluating the toxicity associated with human exposure to silver and gold nanoparticles (NPs), due to the relative abundance of toxicity data available for these particles, when compared to other metal particulates. This has allowed knowledge on the current understanding of the field to be gained, and has demonstrated where gaps in knowledge are. It is anticipated that evaluating the hazards associated with silver and gold particles will ultimately enable risk assessments to be completed, by combining this information with knowledge on the level of human exposure. The quantity of available hazard information for metals is greatest for silver particulates, due to its widespread inclusion within a number of diverse products (including clothes and wound dressings), which primarily arises from its antibacterial behaviour. Gold has been used on numerous occasions to assess the biodistribution and cellular uptake of NPs following exposure. Inflammatory, oxidative, genotoxic, and cytotoxic consequences are associated with silver particulate exposure, and are inherently linked. The primary site of gold and silver particulate accumulation has been consistently demonstrated to be the liver, and it is therefore relevant that a number of in vitro investigations have focused on this potential target organ. However, in general there is a lack of in vivo and in vitro toxicity information that allows correlations between the findings to be made. Instead a focus on the tissue distribution of particles following exposure is evident within the available literature, which can be useful in directing appropriate in vitro experimentation by revealing potential target sites of toxicity. The experimental design has the potential to impact on the toxicological observations, and in particular the use of excessively high particle concentrations has been observed. As witnessed for other particle types, gold and silver particle sizes are influential in dictating the observed toxicity, with smaller particles exhibiting a greater response than their larger counterparts, and this is likely to be driven by differences in particle surface area, when administered at an equal-mass dose. A major obstacle, at present, is deciphering whether the responses related to silver nanoparticulate exposure derive from their small size, or particle dissolution contributes to the observed toxicity. Alternatively, a combination of both may be responsible, as the release of ions would be expected to be greater for smaller particles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20128631     DOI: 10.3109/10408440903453074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol        ISSN: 1040-8444            Impact factor:   5.635


  158 in total

1.  When enough is enough.

Authors:  Steffen Foss Hansen; Anders Baun
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 39.213

2.  Systematic determination of the relationship between nanoparticle core diameter and toxicity for a series of structurally analogous gold nanoparticles in zebrafish.

Authors:  Lisa Truong; Tatiana Zaikova; Brandi L Baldock; Michele Balik-Meisner; Kimberly To; David M Reif; Zachary C Kennedy; James E Hutchison; Robert L Tanguay
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 5.913

3.  Silver nanoparticles alter zebrafish development and larval behavior: distinct roles for particle size, coating and composition.

Authors:  Christina M Powers; Theodore A Slotkin; Frederic J Seidler; Appala R Badireddy; Stephanie Padilla
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 3.763

Review 4.  Gold nanoparticles in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Zhao-Zhin Joanna Lim; Jia-En Jasmine Li; Cheng-Teng Ng; Lin-Yue Lanry Yung; Boon-Huat Bay
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  Evaluating nanotechnology opportunities and risks through integration of life-cycle and risk assessment.

Authors:  Michael P Tsang; Emi Kikuchi-Uehara; Guido W Sonnemann; Cyril Aymonier; Masahiko Hirao
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 39.213

6.  Twisting electrospun nanofiber fine strips into functional sutures for sustained co-delivery of gentamicin and silver.

Authors:  Shixuan Chen; Liangpeng Ge; Aubrey Mueller; Mark A Carlson; Matthew J Teusink; Franklin D Shuler; Jingwei Xie
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 5.307

7.  In vitro cytotoxicity of surface modified bismuth nanoparticles.

Authors:  Yang Luo; Chaoming Wang; Yong Qiao; Mainul Hossain; Liyuan Ma; Ming Su
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 8.  Handling of iron oxide and silver nanoparticles by astrocytes.

Authors:  Michaela C Hohnholt; Mark Geppert; Eva M Luther; Charlotte Petters; Felix Bulcke; Ralf Dringen
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.996

9.  Targeting of BRAF resistant melanoma via extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer receptor.

Authors:  Matthew R Zeiderman; Michael E Egger; Charles W Kimbrough; Christopher G England; Tess V Dupre; Kelly M McMasters; Lacey R McNally
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 10.  Structural and functional photoacoustic molecular tomography aided by emerging contrast agents.

Authors:  Liming Nie; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 54.564

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.