AIM: To assess patients' understanding for the reasons for taking 5-aminosalicylic acid or ursodeoxycholic acid as chemoprophylaxis against colorectal carcinoma associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: A questionnaire-based study using a 5-point opinion scale was performed. One hundred and ninety-two patients with colitis only and 74 patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and IBD were invited to take part. RESULTS: Overall response rate was 58%. Sixty-four percent of patients claimed full concordance with chemoprophylaxis for maintenance of remission. Eighty-four percent of patients considered daily concordance during remission to be very important. Seventy-five percent stated they understood the reasons for taking the drugs. However, only 50% of the patients were aware of any link of their condition to bowel cancer. Seventy-nine percent of patients felt their concordance and understanding would be improved if they were informed of the chemoprophylactic potential of the medication. CONCLUSION: Despite good self-reported concordance, half of the patients were unaware of an association between colitis and bowel cancer. Explaining the potential chemoprophylactic benefits may enhance patients' overall concordance to 5-aminosalicylic acid and ursodeoxycholic acid and help maintain remission.
AIM: To assess patients' understanding for the reasons for taking 5-aminosalicylic acid or ursodeoxycholic acid as chemoprophylaxis against colorectal carcinoma associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: A questionnaire-based study using a 5-point opinion scale was performed. One hundred and ninety-two patients with colitis only and 74 patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and IBD were invited to take part. RESULTS: Overall response rate was 58%. Sixty-four percent of patients claimed full concordance with chemoprophylaxis for maintenance of remission. Eighty-four percent of patients considered daily concordance during remission to be very important. Seventy-five percent stated they understood the reasons for taking the drugs. However, only 50% of the patients were aware of any link of their condition to bowel cancer. Seventy-nine percent of patients felt their concordance and understanding would be improved if they were informed of the chemoprophylactic potential of the medication. CONCLUSION: Despite good self-reported concordance, half of the patients were unaware of an association between colitis and bowel cancer. Explaining the potential chemoprophylactic benefits may enhance patients' overall concordance to 5-aminosalicylic acid and ursodeoxycholic acid and help maintain remission.
Authors: P J Bus; I D Nagtegaal; H W Verspaget; C B Lamers; H Geldof; J H Van Krieken; G Griffioen Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Michael A Kamm; William J Sandborn; Miguel Gassull; Stefan Schreiber; Lechoslaw Jackowski; Todd Butler; Andrew Lyne; David Stephenson; Mary Palmen; Raymond E Joseph Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2006-10-12 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Matthew Rutter; Brian Saunders; Kay Wilkinson; Steve Rumbles; Gillian Schofield; Michael Kamm; Christopher Williams; Ashley Price; Ian Talbot; Alastair Forbes Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Petr Cervený; Martin Bortlík; Ales Kubena; Jirí Vlcek; Peter Laszlo Lakatos; Milan Lukás Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 5.325