PURPOSE: 3-AP is a ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor and has been postulated to act synergistically with other chemotherapeutic agents. This study was conducted to determine the toxicity and antitumor activity of 3-AP with irinotecan. Correlative studies included pharmacokinetics and the effects of ABCB1 and UGT1A1 polymorphisms. METHODS: The treatment plan consisted of irinotecan on day 1 with 3-AP on days 1-3 of a 21-day cycle. Starting dose was irinotecan 150 mg/m(2) and 3-AP 85 mg/m(2) per day. Polymorphisms of ABCB1 were evaluated by pyrosequencing. Drug concentrations were determined by HPLC. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were enrolled, 10 men and 13 women. Tumor types included seven patients with pancreatic cancer, four with lung cancer, two with cholangiocarcinoma, two with mesothelioma, two with ovarian cancer, and six with other malignancies. Two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at dose level 1, requiring amendment of the dose-escalation scheme. Maximal tolerated dose (MTD) was determined to be 3-AP 60 mg/m(2) per day and irinotecan 200 mg/m(2). DLTs consisted of hypoxia, leukopenia, fatigue, infection, thrombocytopenia, dehydration, and ALT elevation. One partial response in a patient with refractory non-small cell lung cancer was seen. Genotyping suggests that patients with wild-type ABCB1 have a higher rate of grade 3 or 4 toxicity than those with ABCB1 mutations. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD for this combination was 3-AP 60 mg/m(2) per day on days 1-3 and irinotecan 200 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 21 days. Antitumor activity in a patient with refractory non-small cell lung cancer was noted at level 1.
PURPOSE:3-AP is a ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor and has been postulated to act synergistically with other chemotherapeutic agents. This study was conducted to determine the toxicity and antitumor activity of 3-AP with irinotecan. Correlative studies included pharmacokinetics and the effects of ABCB1 and UGT1A1 polymorphisms. METHODS: The treatment plan consisted of irinotecan on day 1 with 3-AP on days 1-3 of a 21-day cycle. Starting dose was irinotecan 150 mg/m(2) and 3-AP 85 mg/m(2) per day. Polymorphisms of ABCB1 were evaluated by pyrosequencing. Drug concentrations were determined by HPLC. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were enrolled, 10 men and 13 women. Tumor types included seven patients with pancreatic cancer, four with lung cancer, two with cholangiocarcinoma, two with mesothelioma, two with ovarian cancer, and six with other malignancies. Two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at dose level 1, requiring amendment of the dose-escalation scheme. Maximal tolerated dose (MTD) was determined to be 3-AP 60 mg/m(2) per day and irinotecan 200 mg/m(2). DLTs consisted of hypoxia, leukopenia, fatigue, infection, thrombocytopenia, dehydration, and ALT elevation. One partial response in a patient with refractory non-small cell lung cancer was seen. Genotyping suggests that patients with wild-type ABCB1 have a higher rate of grade 3 or 4 toxicity than those with ABCB1 mutations. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD for this combination was 3-AP 60 mg/m(2) per day on days 1-3 and irinotecan 200 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 21 days. Antitumor activity in a patient with refractory non-small cell lung cancer was noted at level 1.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Y Ando; H Saka; M Ando; T Sawa; K Muro; H Ueoka; A Yokoyama; S Saitoh; K Shimokata; Y Hasegawa Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2000-12-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Anne M Traynor; Ju-Whei Lee; Gerald K Bayer; John M Tate; Sachdev P Thomas; Miroslaw Mazurczak; David L Graham; Jill M Kolesar; Joan H Schiller Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2009-02-24 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: John Murren; Manuel Modiano; Caroline Clairmont; Paula Lambert; Niramol Savaraj; Terry Doyle; Mario Sznol Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2003-09-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Rafael Rosell; Kathleen D Danenberg; Vincente Alberola; Gerold Bepler; Jose Javier Sanchez; Carlos Camps; Mariano Provencio; Dolores Isla; Miquel Taron; Pilar Diz; Angel Artal Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-02-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: David H Ilson; Manjit Bains; David P Kelsen; Eileen O'Reilly; Martin Karpeh; Daniel Coit; Valerie Rusch; Mithat Gonen; Katie Wilson; Bruce D Minsky Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-08-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Diane C Bodurka; Charles Levenback; Judith K Wolf; Jacalyn Gano; J Taylor Wharton; John J Kavanagh; David M Gershenson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-01-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jill M Kolesar; Kamakshi Sachidanandam; William R Schelman; Jens Eickhoff; Kyle D Holen; Anne M Traynor; Dona B Alberti; James P Thomas; Christopher R Chitambar; George Wilding; William E Antholine Journal: Exp Ther Med Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 2.447
Authors: Sanath R Wijerathna; Md Faiz Ahmad; Hai Xu; James W Fairman; Andrew Zhang; Prem Singh Kaushal; Qun Wan; Jianying Kiser; Chris G Dealwis Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Date: 2011-10-13
Authors: Kateryna Ohui; Iryna Stepanenko; Iuliana Besleaga; Maria V Babak; Radu Stafi; Denisa Darvasiova; Gerald Giester; Vivien Pósa; Eva A Enyedy; Daniel Vegh; Peter Rapta; Wee Han Ang; Ana Popović-Bijelić; Vladimir B Arion Journal: Biomolecules Date: 2020-09-19