Literature DB >> 20125111

Outcome measures: evolution in clinical trials of neurological/functional recovery in spinal cord injury.

J F Ditunno1.   

Abstract

The need to determine the beneficial effect of the treatment of spinal cord injury (SCI) requires clearly defined standardized measures of the severity of injury and how well the function is restored. Improved neurological recovery should be linked to increased capacity to perform tasks such as walking, reaching and grasping, which results in meaningful gains in mobility and self-care. Measurements of recovery, capacity, mobility and self-care are the outcomes used to determine the benefits from the treatment and have evolved over the last century with contributions by the mentors and protégés of Sir Ludwig Guttmann, whom we honor today. Randomized clinical trials in the past 20 years have taught us many lessons as to which outcome measures have the greatest validity and reliability. The International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI have become the clinical gold standard for measurement of severity, but would benefit from pathophysiological surrogates to better understand the mechanisms of recovery. Measurements of walking capacity have emerged as valid/reliable/responsive and upper extremity measures are in development, which help distinguish neurological improvement from rehabilitation adaptation. Performance of self-care and mobility has been linked to capacity and severity outcomes. In addition, new partnerships between clinical trial entities, professional societies, industry and federal agencies should facilitate identification of priorities and uniformity of measurement standards. Our ultimate goal is to improve the quality of life of those individuals with SCI whom we serve, but we must focus our investigative efforts carefully, systematically and rigorously as clinical scientists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20125111     DOI: 10.1038/sc.2009.198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  6 in total

Review 1.  A quantitative analysis of clinical trial designs in spinal cord injury based on ICCP guidelines.

Authors:  Marco D Sorani; Michael S Beattie; Jacqueline C Bresnahan
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 2.  Hydrogels in spinal cord injury repair strategies.

Authors:  Giuseppe Perale; Filippo Rossi; Erik Sundstrom; Sara Bacchiega; Maurizio Masi; Gianluigi Forloni; Pietro Veglianese
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 4.418

3.  Spinal cord injury-functional index: item banks to measure physical functioning in individuals with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  David S Tulsky; Alan M Jette; Pamela A Kisala; Claire Kalpakjian; Marcel P Dijkers; Gale Whiteneck; Pengsheng Ni; Steven Kirshblum; Susan Charlifue; Allen W Heinemann; Martin Forchheimer; Mary D Slavin; Bethlyn Houlihan; Denise G Tate; Trevor Dyson-Hudson; Denise G Fyffe; Steve Williams; Jeanne Zanca
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Scoping review of peer reviewed publications addressing rehabilitation for people sustaining traumatic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Lynn H Gerber; Haley Bush; Xinsheng Cindy Cai; Leslie Morse; Lynn Worobey; Steven Garfinkel
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 5.  Spinal cord injury: how can we improve the classification and quantification of its severity and prognosis?

Authors:  Vibhor Krishna; Hampton Andrews; Abhay Varma; Jacobo Mintzer; Mark S Kindy; James Guest
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 5.269

6.  Sustained Delivery of Chondroitinase ABC from Hydrogel System.

Authors:  Filippo Rossi; Pietro Veglianese; Marco Santoro; Simonetta Papa; Cristina Rogora; Valentina Dell'Oro; Gianluigi Forloni; Maurizio Masi; Giuseppe Perale
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2012-03-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.