Literature DB >> 2012462

Amphotericin B vs high-dose ketoconazole for empirical antifungal therapy among febrile, granulocytopenic cancer patients. A prospective, randomized study.

T J Walsh1, M Rubin, J Hathorn, J Gress, M Thaler, J Skelton, J McKnight, M Browne, D Marshall, D Cotton.   

Abstract

We compared high-dose ketoconazole (800 mg/kg per day, orally) with amphotericin B (0.5 mg/kg per day, intravenously) for empirical antifungal therapy in a prospective, randomized study of persistently or recurrently febrile granulocytopenic cancer patients. Among 97 patients eligible for empirical antifungal therapy, 20 (21%) of these patients were ineligible for randomization to ketoconazole treatment because of their inability to tolerate oral medications. Among 72 patients eligible for randomization, 64 were assessable (32 in each arm of the study). Five of six patients with proved fungal infections who were randomized to receive ketoconazole treatment required crossover to amphotericin B treatment because of progressive infection. The conditions of three of these five patients improved after receiving amphotericin B. The frequency of transaminase elevation was higher in those receiving ketoconazole, while the frequency of azotemia was higher in those receiving amphotericin B. Bioavailability of ketoconazole was unpredictable. Amphotericin B remains the drug of choice for empirical antifungal therapy in granulocytopenic patients; whereas, lack of a parenteral formulation, ineffectiveness against proved mycoses, and unreliable bioavailability preclude high-dose ketoconazole from being an appropriate compound for this purpose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2012462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  6 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for preventing oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving treatment.

Authors:  J E Clarkson; H V Worthington; O B Eden
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-01-24

Review 2.  Strategies in prevention of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in immunosuppressed or neutropenic patients.

Authors:  J Beyer; S Schwartz; V Heinemann; W Siegert
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the tolerability and hepatotoxicity of antifungals in empirical and definitive therapy for invasive fungal infection.

Authors:  Jiun-Ling Wang; Chia-Hsuin Chang; Yinong Young-Xu; K Arnold Chan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Multicenter evaluation of a broth macrodilution antifungal susceptibility test for yeasts.

Authors:  R A Fromtling; J N Galgiani; M A Pfaller; A Espinel-Ingroff; K F Bartizal; M S Bartlett; B A Body; C Frey; G Hall; G D Roberts
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Systemically administered antifungal agents. A review of their clinical pharmacology and therapeutic applications.

Authors:  C A Lyman; T J Walsh
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Association of hospital construction with the development of healthcare associated environmental mold infections (HAEMI) in pediatric patients with leukemia.

Authors:  Hanumantha R Pokala; David Leonard; Jennifer Cox; Pat Metcalf; John McClay; Jane Siegel; Naomi Winick
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 3.167

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.