Literature DB >> 2012448

Comparison of sublingual captopril and nifedipine in immediate treatment of hypertensive emergencies. A randomized, single-blind clinical trial.

P Angeli1, M Chiesa, L Caregaro, C Merkel, D Sacerdoti, M Rondana, A Gatta.   

Abstract

Sublingual captopril (25 mg) was compared with sublingual nifedipine (10 mg) to determine their effectiveness and safety in the treatment of hypertensive emergencies. In nine of 10 patients who received sublingual captopril, mean (+/- SD) systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure dropped from 245 +/- 39 to 190 +/- 25 mm Hg (P less than .0025) and from 144 +/- 8 to 115 +/- 8 mm Hg (P less than .001) at 50 minutes, respectively. The hypotensive effect of the drug was maintained for a mean of 4 hours. In six of nine responders to sublingual captopril, blood pressure-lowering effect was associated with a clear improvement of end-organ failure within 60 minutes. There were no side effects, including a dangerous fall in blood pressure or reflex tachycardia. Sublingual nifedipine lowered diastolic blood pressure and systolic blood pressure in eight of 10 patients. The hypotensive effect of nifedipine was more rapid than that of captopril (10 vs 20 minutes for diastolic blood pressure and 20 vs 30 minutes for systolic blood pressure, respectively), but no difference was observed in the time or in the magnitude of peak hypotensive effect between the two treatments, nor was a difference observed in the duration of hypotensive effect. In six of eight responders to nifedipine therapy, a clear improvement of symptoms and signs of end-organ failure was observed within 60 minutes. In three patients, minor side effects were observed. We conclude that sublingual captopril effectively and safely lowers arterial blood pressure in patients with hypertensive emergencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2012448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  12 in total

1.  The effect of pH on the buccal and sublingual absorption of captopril.

Authors:  J C McElnay; T A al-Furaih; C M Hughes; M G Scott; J S Elborn; D P Nicholls
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 2.  Management of patients with hypertensive urgencies and emergencies: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  David Cherney; Sharon Straus
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Sublingual captopril in hypertensive urgencies.

Authors:  A Misra; P Jain; R B Reddy
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Treating hypertension after stroke.

Authors:  C R Macfarlane
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-08-06

5.  High-Risk Patients with Hypertension: Clinical Management Options.

Authors:  Candace D McNaughton; Wesley H Self; Phillip D Levy; Tyler W Barrett
Journal:  Clin Med Rev Vasc Health       Date:  2013-10-08

6.  A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of buffered sublingual captopril in patients with congestive heart failure.

Authors:  J C McElnay; T A al-Furaih; C M Hughes; M G Scott; D P Nicholls
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 7.  Comparative tolerability profile of hypertensive crisis treatments.

Authors:  E Grossman; A N Ironi; F H Messerli
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Management of hypertensive emergencies.

Authors:  J E Deal; T M Barratt; M J Dillon
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  Guidelines for the drug treatment of hypertensive crises.

Authors:  M M Hirschl
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 10.  Pharmacological interventions for hypertensive emergencies.

Authors:  M I Perez; V M Musini
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.