Literature DB >> 20124193

Time-dependent reasons for peritoneal dialysis technique failure and mortality.

Inna Kolesnyk1, Friedo W Dekker, Elisabeth W Boeschoten, Raymond T Krediet.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) technique failure is high compared to hemodialysis (HD). There is a lack of data on the impact of duration of PD treatment on technique survival and on whether there is a difference in risk factors with respect to early and late failure. The aim of this study was to clarify these issues by performing a time-dependent analysis of PD technique and patient survival in a large cohort of incident PD patients.
METHODS: We analyzed 709 incident PD patients participating in the Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis (NECOSAD), who started their treatment between 1997 and 2007. We compared technique and patient survival on PD in 4 periods of follow-up: within the first 3 months, and after 3 - 12 months, 12 - 24 months, and 24 - 36 months of treatment. Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze survival on PD and technique failure. Risk factors were also identified by comparing patients that were transferred to HD with those that remained on PD. Incidence rates for every cause of dropout for each period of follow-up were calculated to establish their trends with respect to PD treatment duration.
RESULTS: There was a significant increase in transplantation rate after the first year of treatment. The rate of switching to HD was highest during the first 3 months and decreased afterward. One-, 2- and 3-year technique survival was 87%, 76%, and 66%, respectively. Age, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease appeared to be risk factors for death on PD or switch to HD: a 1-year increase in age was associated with a relative risk (RR) of PD failure of 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.003 - 1.06]; for diabetes, RR of stopping PD after 3 months of treatment increased from 1.8 (95% CI 1.1 - 3) during the first year to 2.2 (95% CI 1.3 - 4) after the second year; cardiovascular disease had a major impact in the earliest period (RR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2 - 5) and had a stable influence further on (RR 2, 95% CI 1.1 - 3.5). Loss of 1 mL/minute residual glomerular filtration rate (rGFR) appeared to be a significant predictor of PD failure after 3 months of treatment, but within the first 2 years, RR was 1.1 (95% CI 1.04 - 1.25).
CONCLUSIONS: In The Netherlands, transplantation is a main reason to stop PD treatment. The incidence of PD technique failure is at its highest during the earliest months after treatment initiation and decreases later due to fewer catheter and abdominal complications as well as less influence of psychosocial factors. Risk factors for PD discontinuation are those responsible for patient survival: age, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and rGFR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20124193     DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2008.00277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  51 in total

Review 1.  Genetic Polymorphisms and Peritoneal Membrane Function.

Authors:  Imad Siddique; K Scott Brimble; Louise Walkin; Angela Summers; Paul Brenchley; Sarah Herrick; Peter J Margetts
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Peritoneal dialysis patients with critical illness: insurance may be hard to come by.

Authors:  K Scott Brimble; Michael Walsh
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.756

3.  Old and new perspectives on peritoneal dialysis in Italy emerging from the Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group Census.

Authors:  Giancarlo Marinangeli; Gianfranca Cabiddu; Loris Neri; Giusto Viglino; Roberto Russo; Ugo Teatini
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 4.  Center-Centered in a Patient-Centered World?

Authors:  Thyago de Moraes; Jeffrey Perl
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 1.756

5.  Determinants of peritoneal dialysis technique failure in incident US patients.

Authors:  Jenny I Shen; Aya A Mitani; Anjali B Saxena; Benjamin A Goldstein; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 1.756

6.  The risk factors and the impact of hernia development on technique survival in peritoneal dialysis patients: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Shang-Feng Yang; Chia-Jen Liu; Wu-Chang Yang; Chao-Fu Chang; Chih-Yu Yang; Szu-Yuan Li; Chih-Ching Lin
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 1.756

7.  32 years' experience of peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis in a university hospital.

Authors:  Sadie van Esch; Raymond T Krediet; Dirk G Struijk
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 1.756

8.  Extracellular volume expansion and the preservation of residual renal function in Korean peritoneal dialysis patients: a long-term follow up study.

Authors:  Harin Rhee; Min Ja Baek; Hyun Chul Chung; Jong Man Park; Woo Jin Jung; Soo Min Park; Jang Won Lee; Min Ji Shin; Il Young Kim; Sang Heon Song; Dong Won Lee; Soo Bong Lee; Ihm Soo Kwak; Eun Young Seong
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.801

9.  The Association of Effluent Ca125 with Peritoneal Dialysis Technique Failure.

Authors:  Deirisa Lopes Barreto; Tiny Hoekstra; Nynke Halbesma; Martijn Leegte; Elisabeth W Boeschoten; Friedo W Dekker; Raymond T Krediet
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 10.  Peritoneal changes in patients on long-term peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Raymond T Krediet; Dirk G Struijk
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 28.314

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.