Literature DB >> 20124081

The all-polyethylene tibial component in primary total knee arthroplasty.

Terence J Gioe1, Aditya V Maheshwari.   

Abstract

Outcomes of total knee arthroplasties performed with modern all-polyethylene tibial components have been found to be comparable with or better than those of arthroplasties done with metal-backed modular components in numerous mid-to-long-term follow-up studies, radiostereometric analyses, and the few prospective randomized trials available. Advantages of an all-polyethylene tibial component over a metal-backed modular component include lower cost, avoidance of locking-mechanism issues and backside wear, and increased polyethylene thickness after identical bone resections. Disadvantages of an all-polyethylene tibial component compared with a metal-backed modular component include a lack of modularity, limiting intraoperative options; no option for liner removal in the setting of acute irrigation and débridement; and no option for late liner exchange. Primary total knee arthroplasty with a modern all-polyethylene design can be done in many patients, with substantial cost savings across the health-care system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20124081     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  9 in total

Review 1.  All-polyethylene tibial components are equal to metal-backed components: systematic review and meta-regression.

Authors:  Klaas Auke Nouta; Wiebe C Verra; Bart G Pijls; Jan W Schoones; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  All-polyethylene tibial components generate higher stress and micromotions than metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jean Brihault; Alessandro Navacchia; Silvia Pianigiani; Luc Labey; Ronny De Corte; Valerio Pascale; Bernardo Innocenti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  All-polyethylene tibial components in TKA in rheumatoid arthritis: a 25-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Klaas-Auke Nouta; Bart G Pijls; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Metal-backed versus all-polyethylene tibial components in primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tao Cheng; Guoyou Zhang; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Availability of Total Knee Arthroplasty Implants for Metal Hypersensitivity Patients.

Authors:  Sanil Harji Ajwani; Charalambos P Charalambous
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2016-12-01

Review 6.  Cemented all-poly tibia in resource constrained country, affordable and cost-effective care. Is it applicable at this era? Review article.

Authors:  Vickash Kumar; Obada Hasan; Masood Umer; Naveed Baloch
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2019-09-27

7.  All-polyethylene versus metal-backed posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: similar 2-year results of a randomized radiostereometric analysis study.

Authors:  Shaho Hasan; Perla J Marang-Van De Mheen; Bart L Kaptein; Rob G H H Nelissen; Sören Toksvig-Larsen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Total knee arthroplasty in vascular malformation.

Authors:  Harish Bhende; Nanadkishore Laud; Sandeep Deore; V Shashidhar
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.251

9.  Migration of all-polyethylene compared with metal-backed tibial components in cemented total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Koen T Van Hamersveld; Perla J Marang-Van De Mheen; Rob G H H Nelissen; Sören Toksvig-Larsen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 3.717

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.