Literature DB >> 20124059

Minimally invasive compared with traditional transgluteal approach for total hip arthroplasty: a comparative gait analysis.

M Pospischill1, A Kranzl, B Attwenger, K Knahr.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty is purported to allow an improved and faster rehabilitation in the immediate postoperative period because of reduced soft-tissue damage compared with total hip arthroplasty performed with use of a standard approach. In the present study, a minimally invasive approach was compared with a traditional standard approach in terms of the effect on gait kinematics as demonstrated with gait analysis and electromyography.
METHODS: Twenty randomized patients who underwent a primary total hip replacement with use of a minimally invasive modified Watson-Jones approach (minimally invasive group) were compared with a group of twenty patients who underwent a total hip arthroplasty with use of a standard transgluteal Hardinge approach (standard group). All patients received the same cementless implant, inserted with use of standard instruments, and all operations were performed by a single, experienced surgeon. The patients were evaluated with use of three-dimensional gait analysis and dynamic electromyograms at three time points: preoperatively, ten days postoperatively, and twelve weeks postoperatively. Temporospatial and joint-kinematic parameters were evaluated.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to the temporospatial variables of velocity, cadence, step length, and stride length at any tested time point. With regard to the range of motion of the operatively treated hip, the minimally invasive group had a smaller decrease at the ten-day time point in comparison with the standard group. However, this finding was not significant. The reduction in the range of motion was mainly caused by reduced hip extension. A compensatory increase in the pelvic tilt was observed in both groups. One patient in the standard group showed a positive Trendelenburg gait ten days postoperatively; it had disappeared completely at the twelve-week time point.
CONCLUSIONS: With regard to gait kinematics in the early postoperative period (three months), the present study showed no significant benefit for patients who underwent a total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive Watson-Jones approach in comparison with those who were managed with a standard transgluteal approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20124059     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  28 in total

Review 1.  What is the role of minimally invasive surgery in a fast track hip and knee replacement pathway?

Authors:  J M Lloyd; T Wainwright; R G Middleton
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes.

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Vicky Blake; Caroline B Hing
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  [Gait analysis after minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  K Sander; F Layher; C Anders; A Roth; J Babisch; H-C Scholle; R W Kinne
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Tissue preserving total hip arthroplasty using superior capsulotomy.

Authors:  N Capuano; A Del Buono; N Maffulli
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 1.154

5.  Anterior and Anterolateral Approaches for THA Are Associated With Lower Dislocation Risk Without Higher Revision Risk.

Authors:  Dhiren Sheth; Guy Cafri; Maria C S Inacio; Elizabeth W Paxton; Robert S Namba
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Reduced postoperative pain in total hip arthroplasty after minimal-invasive anterior approach.

Authors:  Sascha Goebel; Andre F Steinert; Judith Schillinger; Jochen Eulert; Jens Broscheit; Maximilian Rudert; Ulrich Nöth
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Comparing the anterior, posterior and lateral approach: gait analysis in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Stephen Petis; James Howard; Brent Lanting; Ian Jones; Trevor Birmingham; Edward Vasarhelyi
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Comparison of morphological changes of gluteus medius and abductor strength for total hip arthroplasty via posterior and modified direct lateral approaches.

Authors:  Ting Wang; Long Shao; Wei Xu; Hong Chen; Wei Huang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Comparison of minimally invasive approach versus conventional anterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  T Repantis; T Bouras; P Korovessis
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-02-21

10.  Outcomes of minimally invasive anterolateral THA are not superior to those of minimally invasive direct lateral and posterolateral THA.

Authors:  Nelson V Greidanus; Samir Chihab; Donald S Garbuz; Bassam A Masri; Michael Tanzer; Allan E Gross; Clive P Duncan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.