Literature DB >> 20123671

Association of median household income with burden of coronary artery disease among individuals with diabetes.

Doreen M Rabi1, Alun L Edwards, Lawrence W Svenson, Michelle M Graham, Merril L Knudtson, William A Ghali.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low income is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Diabetes is more prevalent among low income groups, and low income patients with diabetes have been shown to have a greater burden of cardiovascular risk factors and worse cardiovascular outcomes. The objective of this study was to determine whether income status was associated with burden of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with diabetes. METHODS AND
RESULTS: All patients with diabetes presenting for cardiac catheterization between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2002, in Calgary, Canada, were identified through the use of the Alberta Provincial Project for Assessing Outcomes in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) database. This clinical database was merged with Canadian 2001 Census data on median household income per dissemination area using patient postal code data, and income quintiles were derived. Clinical profiles, severity of coronary atherosclerosis, and myocardial jeopardy were compared across income quintiles. Mean scores for severity and jeopardy were compared across income quintiles using analysis of variance. Multivariate linear regression was used to control for baseline differences across income groups. A total of 4596 patients were eligible for inclusion in this study. Clinical profiles differed significantly across income quintiles, with the highest income quintile being younger (P<0.0005), more likely to be male (P=0.029), and having a lower prevalence of smoking (P=0. 039). Low income groups were more likely to report a history of myocardial infarction (P<0.0005) or congestive heart failure (P<0.0005). The highest income groups has significantly less coronary atherosclerosis as measured by the weighted Duke index (6.67 versus 7.38, P<0.002), but there were no differences in lesion severity as measured by the Duke severity scale (2.31 versus 2.41, P=0.334). High income patients has significantly less myocardial jeopardy compared with the lowest income group as measured by the Duke and APPROACH scores (36.44 versus 46.23, P=0.0187, and 39.96 versus 45.36, P=0.0182, respectively). These differences remained significant even after controlling for baseline clinical differences in cardiovascular risk factor burden.
CONCLUSIONS: Low income is associated with a greater degree of atherosclerosis and greater myocardial jeopardy in patients with diabetes. More needs to be done to reduce cardiovascular risk factor burden in this vulnerable population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20123671     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.840611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes        ISSN: 1941-7713


  9 in total

1.  Demographic, social, economic and geographic factors associated with long-term outcomes in a cohort of cardiac arrest survivors.

Authors:  Patrick J Coppler; Jonathan Elmer; Jon C Rittenberger; Clifton W Callaway; David J Wallace
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 5.262

2.  Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status and Adverse Outcomes in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Matthew L Topel; Jeong Hwan Kim; Mahasin S Mujahid; Samaah M Sullivan; Yi-An Ko; Viola Vaccarino; Arshed A Quyyumi; Tené T Lewis
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Insurance status, not race, is associated with mortality after an acute cardiovascular event in Maryland.

Authors:  Derek K Ng; Daniel J Brotman; Bryan Lau; J Hunter Young
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Delayed educational reminders for long-term medication adherence in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (DERLA-STEMI): protocol for a pragmatic, cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Noah M Ivers; Jon-David Schwalm; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Holly Witteman; Monica Taljaard; Merrick Zwarenstein; Madhu K Natarajan
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 5.  Understanding the social determinants of health among Indigenous Canadians: priorities for health promotion policies and actions.

Authors:  Fariba Kolahdooz; Forouz Nader; Kyoung J Yi; Sangita Sharma
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.640

6.  Increased coronary artery disease severity in black women undergoing coronary bypass surgery.

Authors:  Jimmy T Efird; Wesley T O'Neal; William F Griffin; Ethan J Anderson; Stephen W Davies; Hope Landrine; Jason B O'Neal; Kristin Y Shiue; Linda C Kindell; T Bruce Ferguson; W Randolph Chitwood; Alan P Kypson
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Area Median Income and Metropolitan Versus Nonmetropolitan Location of Care for Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Complex Interaction of Social Determinants.

Authors:  Gabriel E Fabreau; Alexander A Leung; Danielle A Southern; Matthew T James; Merrill L Knudtson; William A Ghali; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 5.501

8.  The Influence of Socioeconomic Status (SES) and Processing Speed on the Psychological Adjustment and Wellbeing of Pediatric Brain Tumor Survivors.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Oprandi; Viola Oldrati; Claudia Cavatorta; Lorenza Gandola; Maura Massimino; Alessandra Bardoni; Geraldina Poggi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 9.  Low socioeconomic status is associated with worse survival in children with cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sumit Gupta; Marta Wilejto; Jason D Pole; Astrid Guttmann; Lillian Sung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.