BACKGROUND: National guidelines for primary prevention suggest consideration of lifetime risk for cardiovascular disease in addition to 10-year risk, but it is currently unknown how many US adults would be identified as having low short-term but high lifetime predicted risk if stepwise stratification were used. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 6329 cardiovascular disease-free and nonpregnant individuals ages 20 to 79 years, representing approximately 156 million US adults, from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003 to 2004 and 2005 to 2006. We assigned 10-year and lifetime predicted risks to stratify participants into 3 groups: low 10-year (<10%)/low lifetime (<39%) predicted risk, low 10-year (<10%)/high lifetime (> or = 39%) predicted risk, and high 10-year (> or = 10%) predicted risk or diagnosed diabetes. The majority of US adults (56%, or 87 million individuals) are at low short-term but high lifetime predicted risk for cardiovascular disease. Twenty-six percent (41 million adults) are at low short-term and low lifetime predicted risk, and only 18% (28 million individuals) are at high short-term predicted risk. The addition of lifetime risk estimation to 10-year risk estimation identifies higher-risk women and younger men in particular. CONCLUSIONS: Whereas 82% of US adults are at low short-term risk, two thirds of this group, or 87 million people, are at high lifetime predicted risk for cardiovascular disease. These results provide support for use of a stepwise stratification system aimed at improving risk communication, and they provide a baseline for public health efforts aimed at increasing the proportion of Americans with low short-term and low lifetime risk for cardiovascular disease.
BACKGROUND: National guidelines for primary prevention suggest consideration of lifetime risk for cardiovascular disease in addition to 10-year risk, but it is currently unknown how many US adults would be identified as having low short-term but high lifetime predicted risk if stepwise stratification were used. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 6329 cardiovascular disease-free and nonpregnant individuals ages 20 to 79 years, representing approximately 156 million US adults, from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003 to 2004 and 2005 to 2006. We assigned 10-year and lifetime predicted risks to stratify participants into 3 groups: low 10-year (<10%)/low lifetime (<39%) predicted risk, low 10-year (<10%)/high lifetime (> or = 39%) predicted risk, and high 10-year (> or = 10%) predicted risk or diagnosed diabetes. The majority of US adults (56%, or 87 million individuals) are at low short-term but high lifetime predicted risk for cardiovascular disease. Twenty-six percent (41 million adults) are at low short-term and low lifetime predicted risk, and only 18% (28 million individuals) are at high short-term predicted risk. The addition of lifetime risk estimation to 10-year risk estimation identifies higher-risk women and younger men in particular. CONCLUSIONS: Whereas 82% of US adults are at low short-term risk, two thirds of this group, or 87 million people, are at high lifetime predicted risk for cardiovascular disease. These results provide support for use of a stepwise stratification system aimed at improving risk communication, and they provide a baseline for public health efforts aimed at increasing the proportion of Americans with low short-term and low lifetime risk for cardiovascular disease.
Authors: Lori Mosca; Lawrence J Appel; Emelia J Benjamin; Kathy Berra; Nisha Chandra-Strobos; Rosalind P Fabunmi; Deborah Grady; Constance K Haan; Sharonne N Hayes; Debra R Judelson; Nora L Keenan; Patrick McBride; Suzanne Oparil; Pamela Ouyang; Mehmet C Oz; Michael E Mendelsohn; Richard C Pasternak; Vivian W Pinn; Rose Marie Robertson; Karin Schenck-Gustafsson; Cathy A Sila; Sidney C Smith; George Sopko; Anne L Taylor; Brian W Walsh; Nanette K Wenger; Christine L Williams Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-02-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: J Stamler; R Stamler; J D Neaton; D Wentworth; M L Daviglus; D Garside; A R Dyer; K Liu; P Greenland Journal: JAMA Date: 1999-12-01 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Donald Lloyd-Jones; Robert Adams; Mercedes Carnethon; Giovanni De Simone; T Bruce Ferguson; Katherine Flegal; Earl Ford; Karen Furie; Alan Go; Kurt Greenlund; Nancy Haase; Susan Hailpern; Michael Ho; Virginia Howard; Brett Kissela; Steven Kittner; Daniel Lackland; Lynda Lisabeth; Ariane Marelli; Mary McDermott; James Meigs; Dariush Mozaffarian; Graham Nichol; Christopher O'Donnell; Veronique Roger; Wayne Rosamond; Ralph Sacco; Paul Sorlie; Randall Stafford; Julia Steinberger; Thomas Thom; Sylvia Wasserthiel-Smoller; Nathan Wong; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Yuling Hong Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-01-27 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Lloyd E Chambless; Aaron R Folsom; A Richey Sharrett; Paul Sorlie; David Couper; Moyses Szklo; F Javier Nieto Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Martha L Daviglus; Kiang Liu; Amber Pirzada; Lijing L Yan; Daniel B Garside; Joseph Feinglass; Jack M Guralnik; Philip Greenland; Jeremiah Stamler Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2003-11-10
Authors: Jarett D Berry; Alan Dyer; Xuan Cai; Daniel B Garside; Hongyan Ning; Avis Thomas; Philip Greenland; Linda Van Horn; Russell P Tracy; Donald M Lloyd-Jones Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Holly C Gooding; Hongyan Ning; Matthew W Gillman; Christina Shay; Norrina Allen; David C Goff; Donald Lloyd-Jones; Stephanie Chiuve Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Alan S Go; Dariush Mozaffarian; Véronique L Roger; Emelia J Benjamin; Jarett D Berry; Michael J Blaha; Shifan Dai; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Sheila Franco; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; Virginia J Howard; Mark D Huffman; Suzanne E Judd; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Rachel H Mackey; David J Magid; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Darren K McGuire; Emile R Mohler; Claudia S Moy; Michael E Mussolino; Robert W Neumar; Graham Nichol; Dilip K Pandey; Nina P Paynter; Matthew J Reeves; Paul D Sorlie; Joel Stein; Amytis Towfighi; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Daniel Woo; Melanie B Turner Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Amanda S Hinerman; Emma J M Barinas-Mitchell; Samar R El Khoudary; Anita P Courcoulas; Abdus S Wahed; Wendy C King Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2020-04-19 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Emelia J Benjamin; Michael J Blaha; Stephanie E Chiuve; Mary Cushman; Sandeep R Das; Rajat Deo; Sarah D de Ferranti; James Floyd; Myriam Fornage; Cathleen Gillespie; Carmen R Isasi; Monik C Jiménez; Lori Chaffin Jordan; Suzanne E Judd; Daniel Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda Lisabeth; Simin Liu; Chris T Longenecker; Rachel H Mackey; Kunihiro Matsushita; Dariush Mozaffarian; Michael E Mussolino; Khurram Nasir; Robert W Neumar; Latha Palaniappan; Dilip K Pandey; Ravi R Thiagarajan; Mathew J Reeves; Matthew Ritchey; Carlos J Rodriguez; Gregory A Roth; Wayne D Rosamond; Comilla Sasson; Amytis Towfighi; Connie W Tsao; Melanie B Turner; Salim S Virani; Jenifer H Voeks; Joshua Z Willey; John T Wilkins; Jason Hy Wu; Heather M Alger; Sally S Wong; Paul Muntner Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Rachel H Mackey; Steven H Belle; Anita P Courcoulas; Greg F Dakin; Clifford W Deveney; David R Flum; Luis Garcia; Wendy C King; Lewis H Kuller; James E Mitchell; Alfons Pomp; Walter J Pories; Bruce M Wolfe Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2012-06-27 Impact factor: 2.778