OBJECTIVE: Reconstructing irradiated mandibles with biomaterials is still a challenge but little investigated. We collected data that could help us understand studies in the field of regeneration with biomaterials and irradiated bone. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of the literature. RESULTS: Delay and duration of radiation delivery and total equivalent dose are the most variable parameters in the various studies, resulting in confusion when interpreting the literature. Most reproducible experiments show that radiation reduces osteogenic cell numbers, alters cytokine capacity, and delays and damages bone remodeling. Interindividual variations and how such changes become irreversible lesions are still uncertain. In the case of regeneration using biomaterials, most studies have addressed the question of reconstruction in previously irradiated bone. The results show that osseointegration is often possible, although the failure rate is higher. The sooner the implantation takes place after the end of the radiation, the higher the likelihood of failure. Few studies have focused on primary reconstruction followed by early irradiation, and most of the currently available engineering models would be altered by radiation. Good outcomes have been obtained with bone morphogenetic protein and with total bone marrow transplanation. CONCLUSION: This review points out the difficulties in achieving reproducible experiments and interpreting literature in this underinvestigated field. Copyright (c) 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: Reconstructing irradiated mandibles with biomaterials is still a challenge but little investigated. We collected data that could help us understand studies in the field of regeneration with biomaterials and irradiated bone. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of the literature. RESULTS: Delay and duration of radiation delivery and total equivalent dose are the most variable parameters in the various studies, resulting in confusion when interpreting the literature. Most reproducible experiments show that radiation reduces osteogenic cell numbers, alters cytokine capacity, and delays and damages bone remodeling. Interindividual variations and how such changes become irreversible lesions are still uncertain. In the case of regeneration using biomaterials, most studies have addressed the question of reconstruction in previously irradiated bone. The results show that osseointegration is often possible, although the failure rate is higher. The sooner the implantation takes place after the end of the radiation, the higher the likelihood of failure. Few studies have focused on primary reconstruction followed by early irradiation, and most of the currently available engineering models would be altered by radiation. Good outcomes have been obtained with bone morphogenetic protein and with total bone marrow transplanation. CONCLUSION: This review points out the difficulties in achieving reproducible experiments and interpreting literature in this underinvestigated field. Copyright (c) 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Kevin M Urlaub; Russell E Ettinger; Noah S Nelson; Jessie M Hoxie; Alicia E Snider; Joseph E Perosky; Yekaterina Polyatskaya; Alexis Donneys; Steven R Buchman Journal: J Craniofac Surg Date: 2019 Mar/Apr Impact factor: 1.046
Authors: Xu Cao; Xiangwei Wu; Deborah Frassica; Bing Yu; Lijuan Pang; Lingling Xian; Mei Wan; Weiqi Lei; Michael Armour; Erik Tryggestad; John Wong; Chun Yi Wen; William Weijia Lu; Frank J Frassica Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-01-10 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jonas D Batista; Darceny Zanetta-Barbosa; Sérgio V Cardoso; Paula Dechichi; Flaviana S Rocha; Rogério M Pagnoncelli Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2014-06-10 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Geert M G Hommez; Gert O De Meerleer; Wilfried J De Neve; Roeland J G De Moor Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2012-01-06 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Catherine N Tchanque-Fossuo; Laura A Monson; Aaron S Farberg; Alexis Donneys; Aria J Zehtabzadeh; Elizabeth R Razdolsky; Steven R Buchman Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: P Bléry; P Corre; O Malard; S Sourice; P Pilet; Y Amouriq; J Guicheux; P Weiss; F Espitalier Journal: J Mater Sci Mater Med Date: 2014-08-01 Impact factor: 3.896
Authors: Alexander R Zheutlin; Sagar S Deshpande; Noah S Nelson; Yekaterina Polyatskaya; Jose J Rodriguez; Alexis Donneys; Steven R Buchman Journal: J Oral Maxillofac Surg Date: 2015-08-07 Impact factor: 1.895