Literature DB >> 20123247

A novel percutaneous mechanical biventricular bridge to recovery in severe cardiac allograft rejection.

Vivek Rajagopal1, Gregg Steahr, Charles I Wilmer, Nirav Y Raval.   

Abstract

We describe the case of a 36-year-old man with acute cardiac transplant rejection bridged to recovery using simultaneous Impella 2.5 and TandemHeart percutaneous support devices. The patient underwent orthotopic cardiac transplantation 2 years earlier, and presented to our hospital with allograft failure 7 days after non-compliance with tacrolimus. Because of persistent cardiogenic shock despite intra-aortic balloon and inotropic support, we implanted an Impella 2.5 percutaneous assist device for left ventricular support. Persistent right ventricular dysfunction necessitated insertion of a TandemHeart for right ventricular support. After a course of intravenous solumedrol and anti-thymocyte globulin, both the Impella and TandemHeart devices were successfully weaned and removed. Nine months later, his left ventricular ejection fraction had stabilized from 10% to 55%. Copyright (c) 2010 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20123247     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2009.09.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  12 in total

1.  Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Kevin J Morine; Navin K Kapur
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-01

2.  Staged approach to mechanical circulatory support and recovered allograft function after transplantation rejection with cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Manuel Caceres; Lawrence S C Czer; Fardad Esmailian; Daniel Luthringer; Danny Ramzy; Jaime Moriguchi
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2013

3.  Myocardial recovery with left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Maya Guglin; Leslie Miller
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2012-08

Review 4.  Outcomes of percutaneous temporary biventricular mechanical support: a systematic review.

Authors:  Matthew P Weber; Thomas J O'Malley; Jae H Choi; Elizabeth J Maynes; Kyle W Prochno; Melissa A Austin; Chelsey T Wood; Sinal Patel; Rohinton J Morris; H Todd Massey; Vakhtang Tchantchaleishvili
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 4.214

5.  Percutaneous ventricular assist devices: new deus ex machina?

Authors:  Diego Arroyo; Stéphane Cook
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2011-07-31

Review 6.  Clinical review: mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Matthew E Cove; Graeme MacLaren
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 7.  Temporary mechanical circulatory support: a review of the options, indications, and outcomes.

Authors:  Nisha A Gilotra; Gerin R Stevens
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2015-02-03

8.  Percutaneous Mechanical Ventricular Support in Acute Cardiac Care: A UK Quaternary Centre Experience Using 2.5L, 3.8L and 5.0L Impella Catheters.

Authors:  Vinod Venugopal; Jon Spiro; Alex Zaphiriou; Sohail Khan; Jonathan N Townend; Peter F Ludman; Sagar N Doshi
Journal:  Cardiol Ther       Date:  2014-12-17

9.  Past and present of cardiocirculatory assist devices: a comprehensive critical review.

Authors:  Gianluca Rigatelli; Francesco Santini; Giuseppe Faggian
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 10.  Extracorporeal life support devices and strategies for management of acute cardiorespiratory failure in adult patients: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Kiran Shekar; Daniel V Mullany; Bruce Thomson; Marc Ziegenfuss; David G Platts; John F Fraser
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.