Literature DB >> 20123208

Semiautomated versus manual evaluation of liver metastases treated by radiofrequency ablation.

Sebastian Keil1, Philipp Bruners, Lutz Ohnsorge, Cedric Plumhans, Florian F Behrendt, Sven Stanzel, Michael Sühling, Rolf W Günther, Marco Das, Andreas H Mahnken.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of semiautomated volume and density measurements of liver metastases from colorectal and breast cancer before and after radiofrequency (RF) ablation compared with manual evaluation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients (mean age, 63.2 years +/- 10.7) with 50 known liver metastases from underlying primary breast (n = 15) or colorectal cancer (n = 35) underwent triphasic contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (CT) to evaluate hepatic tumor load and localization before RF ablation and for postinterventional follow-up. Each lesion was quantified in terms of volume and CT value (in HU) with a semiautomated software tool and manually by an experienced radiologist before and 4 months after RF ablation.
RESULTS: Before RF ablation, all 50 liver metastases, and after ablation, 49 of 50 ablation zones (98%), were correctly evaluated by the software. Mean lesion volumes before and after the intervention were 5.5 cm(3) and 22.4 cm(3), respectively. Corresponding concordance correlation coefficients between measurement techniques were 0.98 and 0.99, respectively, for volume; and 0.90 and 0.76, respectively, for CT value.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with manual measurements, semiautomated volumetric assessment of liver metastases before and after RF ablation demonstrated a high degree of correlation. Agreement of attenuation was slightly worse, particularly when assessing the postinterventional multidetector CT examination, probably because of the different regions of interest used for manual and semiautomated assessment of CT values. Copyright (c) 2010 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20123208     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.10.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of semi-automated and manual methods to measure the volume of liver tumours on MDCT images.

Authors:  Léna Dubus; Mathilde Gayet; Magaly Zappa; Liliane Abaleo; Aurélie De Cooman; Guillaume Orieux; Valérie Vilgrain
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-12-05       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Detection of time-varying structures by large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping to aid reading of high-resolution CT images of the lung.

Authors:  Ryo Sakamoto; Susumu Mori; Michael I Miller; Tomohisa Okada; Kaori Togashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Interactive Volumetry Of Liver Ablation Zones.

Authors:  Jan Egger; Harald Busse; Philipp Brandmaier; Daniel Seider; Matthias Gawlitza; Steffen Strocka; Philip Voglreiter; Mark Dokter; Michael Hofmann; Bernhard Kainz; Alexander Hann; Xiaojun Chen; Tuomas Alhonnoro; Mika Pollari; Dieter Schmalstieg; Michael Moche
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Characteristic changes of the ablation zone on contrast-enhanced computed tomography after radiofrequency ablation of hepatic metastases.

Authors:  Markus Zimmermann; Christiane Kuhl; Sebastian Keil
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

5.  Radiofrequency ablation versus hepatic resection for breast cancer liver metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yi-Bin Xiao; Bo Zhang; Yu-Lian Wu
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.066

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.