Literature DB >> 20123116

Coexistence of anhedonia and anxiety-independent increased novelty-seeking behavior in the chronic mild stress model of depression.

Y Li1, X Zheng, J Liang, Y Peng.   

Abstract

Previous research demonstrated excessive decreases in reward sensitivity and increases in harm avoidance in depressed individuals. These results straightly lead to a hypothesis that depressed patients should avoid novelty or express reduced novelty-seeking behavior. Nevertheless, literature in this regard is inconsistent. Furthermore, whether the potentially altered novelty-associated behavior is dependent on changed anxiety/fear or related to altered goal-directed approaching tendency is unclear. Here, we tested novel object-approaching behavior in a free-exploration paradigm in chronic mild stress (CMS)-induced anhedonic and stress-resistant rats respectively. Other CMS-induced, emotional behaviors were also examined in a battery of behavioral tests including novel cage, exploration, locomotor activity and elevated plus maze (EPM). We found that compared with controls, stress-resistant rats who consistently showed lower anxiety level in EPM (time in open arms) and, open-field (OF) test (time in central area) showed no sign of enhanced novel object approaching behavior. To the contrary, the anhedonic ones who did not express any sign of reduced anxiety showed paradoxically intensified novelty-approaching behavior. We concluded that reduced anxiety would not necessarily lead to enhanced novelty-seeking behavior; anhedonia coexists with anxiety-independent, increased novelty-seeking behavior. The salient paradox of coexistence of anhedonia and increased novelty-seeking behavior was critically discussed. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20123116     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.01.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  9 in total

1.  Neurochemical, hormonal, and behavioral effects of chronic unpredictable stress in the rat.

Authors:  Brittney M Cox; Fares Alsawah; Peter C McNeill; Matthew P Galloway; Shane A Perrine
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Circadian arrhythmia dysregulates emotional behaviors in aged Siberian hamsters.

Authors:  Brian J Prendergast; Kenneth G Onishi; Priyesh N Patel; Tyler J Stevenson
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Personality dimensions as common and broadband-specific features for internalizing and externalizing disorders.

Authors:  Laura K Hink; Soo H Rhee; Robin P Corley; Victoria E Cosgrove; John K Hewitt; Robert J Schulz-Heik; Benjamin B Lahey; Irwin D Waldman
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2013-08

4.  Modulatory effects of the piccolo genotype on emotional memory in health and depression.

Authors:  Saskia Woudstra; Marie-José van Tol; Zoltán Bochdanovits; Nic J van der Wee; Frans G Zitman; Mark A van Buchem; Esther M Opmeer; André Aleman; Brenda W Penninx; Dick J Veltman; Witte J Hoogendijk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Update in the methodology of the chronic stress paradigm: internal control matters.

Authors:  Tatyana Strekalova; Yvonne Couch; Natalia Kholod; Marco Boyks; Dmitry Malin; Pierre Leprince; Harry Mw Steinbusch
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.759

6.  Diurnal oscillation of amygdala clock gene expression and loss of synchrony in a mouse model of depression.

Authors:  Giorgia Savalli; Weifei Diao; Stefan Schulz; Kristina Todtova; Daniela D Pollak
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 5.176

7.  Reliability of the chronic mild stress model of depression: A user survey.

Authors:  Paul Willner
Journal:  Neurobiol Stress       Date:  2016-08-22

Review 8.  Relevance of Rodent Models of Depression in Clinical Practice: Can We Overcome the Obstacles in Translational Neuropsychiatry?

Authors:  Johan Söderlund; Maria Lindskog
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 5.176

Review 9.  Individual differences and the characterization of animal models of psychopathology: a strong challenge and a good opportunity.

Authors:  Antonio Armario; Roser Nadal
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 5.810

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.