Literature DB >> 20122849

The effects of accelerometer placement on mechanomyographic amplitude and mean power frequency during cycle ergometry.

Jorge M Zuniga1, Terry J Housh, Clayton L Camic, C Russell Hendrix, Michelle Mielke, Richard J Schmidt, Glen O Johnson.   

Abstract

The purposes of this study were threefold: (1) to compare the power output related patterns of absolute and normalized MMG amplitude and MPF responses for proximal and distal accelerometer placements on the vastus lateralis (VL) muscle during incremental cycle ergometry; (2) to examine the influence of accelerometer placements on mean absolute MMG amplitude and MPF values; and (3) to determine the effects of normalization on mean MMG amplitude and MPF values from proximal and distal accelerometer placements. Fifteen adults (10 men and 5 women; mean+/-SD age=23.9+/-3.1 years) performed incremental cycle ergometry tests to exhaustion. Two accelerometers were placed proximal and distal on the VL muscle. Paired t-tests indicated that absolute MMG amplitude values for the proximal accelerometer were greater (p<0.05) than the distal accelerometer at all power outputs. The normalized MMG amplitude also had greater values for the proximal accelerometer at all power outputs, except 50W. There were no differences, however, between proximal and distal accelerometers for absolute MMG MPF, except at 75W, and normalization eliminated this difference. Twenty-seven percent of the subjects exhibited different power output related patterns of responses between accelerometer placements for MMG amplitude and 47% exhibited different patterns for MPF. These findings indicated that normalization did not eliminate the influence of accelerometer placement on MMG amplitude and highlighted the importance of standardizing accelerometer placements to compare MMG values during cycle ergometry. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20122849     DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol        ISSN: 1050-6411            Impact factor:   2.368


  4 in total

1.  Mechanomyographic parameter extraction methods: an appraisal for clinical applications.

Authors:  Morufu Olusola Ibitoye; Nur Azah Hamzaid; Jorge M Zuniga; Nazirah Hasnan; Ahmad Khairi Abdul Wahab
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.576

2.  New advances in mechanomyography sensor technology and signal processing: Validity and intrarater reliability of recordings from muscle.

Authors:  Claire Meagher; Enrico Franco; Ruth Turk; Samuel Wilson; Nathan Steadman; Lauren McNicholas; Ravi Vaidyanathan; Jane Burridge; Maria Stokes
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2020-04-09

3.  Estimation of Knee Extension Force Using Mechanomyography Signals Based on GRA and ICS-SVR.

Authors:  Zebin Li; Lifu Gao; Wei Lu; Daqing Wang; Huibin Cao; Gang Zhang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 4.  Mechanomyogram for muscle function assessment: a review.

Authors:  Md Anamul Islam; Kenneth Sundaraj; R Badlishah Ahmad; Nizam Uddin Ahamed
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.