Literature DB >> 20122721

Structure-property relationships of silk-modified mesoporous bioglass scaffolds.

Chengtie Wu1, Yufeng Zhang, Yufang Zhu, Thor Friis, Yin Xiao.   

Abstract

Porous mesopore-bioglass (MBG) scaffolds have been proposed as a new class of bone regeneration materials due to their apatite-formation and drug-delivery properties; however, the material's inherent brittleness and high degradation and surface instability are major disadvantages, which compromise its mechanical strength and cytocompatibility as a biological scaffold. Silk, on the other hand, is a native biomaterial and is well characterized with respect to biocompatibility and tensile strength. In this study we set out to investigate what effects blending silk with MBG had on the physiochemical, drug-delivery and biological properties of MBG scaffolds with a view to bone tissue engineering applications. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) were the methods used to analyze the inner microstructure, pore size and morphology, and composition of MBG scaffolds, before and after addition of silk. The effect of silk modification on the mechanical property of MBG scaffolds was determined by testing the compressive strength of the scaffolds and also compressive strength after degradation over time. The drug-delivery potential was evaluated by the release of dexamethasone (DEX) from the scaffolds. Finally, the cytocompatibility of silk-modified scaffolds was investigated by the attachment, morphology, proliferation, differentiation and bone-relative gene expression of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs). The results showed that silk modification improved the uniformity and continuity of pore network of MBG scaffolds, and maintained high porosity (94%) and large-pore size (200-400 microm). There was a significant improvement in mechanical strength, mechanical stability, and control of burst release of DEX in silk-modified MBG scaffolds. Silk modification also appeared to provide a better environment for BMSC attachment, spreading, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation on MBG scaffolds. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20122721     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  32 in total

Review 1.  Bioactive glasses as carriers for bioactive molecules and therapeutic drugs: a review.

Authors:  Jasmin Hum; Aldo R Boccaccini
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Mesoporous bioactive glasses: structure characteristics, drug/growth factor delivery and bone regeneration application.

Authors:  Chengtie Wu; Jiang Chang
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.906

3.  Bone Physiology, Biomaterial and the Effect of Mechanical/Physical Microenvironment on MSC Osteogenesis: A Tribute to Shu Chien's 80th Birthday.

Authors:  Xiaoling Liao; Shaoying Lu; Yue Zhuo; Christina Winter; Wenfeng Xu; Bo Li; Yingxiao Wang
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.321

4.  Multiple silk coatings on biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds: effect on physical and mechanical properties and in vitro osteogenic response of human mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Jiao Jiao Li; Eun Seok Gil; Rebecca S Hayden; Chunmei Li; Seyed-Iman Roohani-Esfahani; David L Kaplan; Hala Zreiqat
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 6.988

5.  Electrophoretic deposition of mesoporous bioactive glass on glass-ceramic foam scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Sonia Fiorilli; Francesco Baino; Valentina Cauda; Marco Crepaldi; Chiara Vitale-Brovarone; Danilo Demarchi; Barbara Onida
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Rapid prototyping for tissue-engineered bone scaffold by 3D printing and biocompatibility study.

Authors:  Hui-Yu He; Jia-Yu Zhang; Xue Mi; Yang Hu; Xiao-Yu Gu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

7.  Antibacterial and anticancerous drug loading kinetics for (10-x)CuO-xZnO-20CaO-60SiO2-10P2O5 (2 ≤ x ≤ 8) mesoporous bioactive glasses.

Authors:  Shikha Garg; Swati Thakur; Aayush Gupta; Gurbinder Kaur; Om Prakash Pandey
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Mesoporous silicate nanoparticles/3D nanofibrous scaffold-mediated dual-drug delivery for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Qingqing Yao; Yangxi Liu; Balaranjan Selvaratnam; Ranjit T Koodali; Hongli Sun
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 9.776

9.  Composite scaffolds of mesoporous bioactive glass and polyamide for bone repair.

Authors:  Jiacan Su; Liehu Cao; Baoqing Yu; Shaojun Song; Xinwei Liu; Zhiwei Wang; Ming Li
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2012-05-21

Review 10.  Foam Replica Method in the Manufacturing of Bioactive Glass Scaffolds: Out-of-Date Technology or Still Underexploited Potential?

Authors:  Elisa Fiume; Sara Ciavattini; Enrica Verné; Francesco Baino
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.