Literature DB >> 20122435

Sequential bone healing of immediately loaded mini-implants: histomorphometric and fluorescence analysis.

Glaucio Serra1, Liliane S Morais, Carlos Nelson Elias, Marc A Meyers, Leonardo Andrade, Carlos A Müller, Marcelo Müller.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Mini-implants are often immediately loaded for orthodontic treatment; however, changes in interfacial tissues caused by early loading and its effects might compromise the mini-implant's function. The purpose of this study was to compare the healing of interfacial tissues 1, 4, and 12 weeks after the placement of titanium-alloy mini-implants in New Zealand rabbits; some of the implants were loaded immediately and others were left unloaded.
METHODS: Eighteen animals were used in the experiment. Each received 4 titanium grade 5 mini-implants (2.0 x 6.0 mm), 2 of which were immediately loaded with 1 N of force. Tissue healing was verified at 1, 4, and 12 weeks after placement. Four different fluorescent molecules were injected into the rabbits to label calcium deposition. After the rabbits were killed, mineralized bone samples with the mini-implants were removed, fixed, cut, stained, and observed with bright-field, polarized, and fluorescence microscopy.
RESULTS: After 12 weeks of healing, higher bone contact and bone area were observed than after 1 or 4 weeks, regardless of loading. Differences between the loaded and unloaded groups were not observed (P <0.05) at 1 and 4 weeks. The bone deposition rate was higher in the loaded group.
CONCLUSIONS: The 1-N immediate force application did not compromise bone formation around mini-implants. Copyright 2010 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20122435     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.12.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  6 in total

1.  Primary migration of a mini-implant under a functional orthodontic loading.

Authors:  Joseph W Pittman; Anand Navalgund; Steve H Byun; Hechang Huang; Albert H Kim; Do-Gyoon Kim
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Comparison between microporous and nanoporous orthodontic miniscrews : An experimental study in rabbits.

Authors:  Yueh-Tse Lee; Eric Jein-Wein Liou; Sinn-Wen Chen
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Effects of predrilling on the osseointegration potential of mini-implants.

Authors:  Yun-Seob Shin; Hyo-Won Ahn; Young-Guk Park; Seong-Hun Kim; Kyu-Rhim Chung; Il-Sik Cho; Gerald Nelson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Effects of a newly designed apparatus on orthodontic skeletal anchorage.

Authors:  Murat Tozlu; Didem Nalbantgil; Fulya Ozdemir
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2013-09

5.  Comparison of Rate of Canine Retraction and Anchorage Potential between Mini-implant and Conventional Molar Anchorage: An In vivo Study.

Authors:  D Davis; R Krishnaraj; Sangeetha Duraisamy; K Ravi; S Dilip; Anila Charles; N C Sushil
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

6.  Bone remodelling patterns around orthodontic mini-implants migrating in bone: an experimental study in rat vertebrae.

Authors:  Kathrin Becker; Nicole Rauch; Giulia Brunello; Sarah Azimi; Mathias Beller; Mira Hüfner; Manuel Nienkemper; Beryl Schwarz-Herzke; Dieter Drescher
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.075

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.