Literature DB >> 20122433

Midpalatal miniscrews for orthodontic anchorage: factors affecting clinical success.

Young Ho Kim1, Seung-Min Yang, Seonwoo Kim, Joo Yong Lee, Kyu Eok Kim, Anthony A Gianelly, Seung-Hyun Kyung.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to investigate the success rate of midpalatal miniscrews used for orthodontic anchorage and the factors affecting clinical success.
METHODS: One hundred twenty-eight consecutive patients (101 female, 27 male; mean age, 23.4 years), who received a total of 210 miniscrews in the midpalatal suture area, were examined. Success rates were determined according to 10 clinical variables.
RESULTS: The overall success rates were 88.20% for the total number of patients and 90.80% for the total number of miniscrews. There were no significant associations among success rate and sex, total period of treatment with miniscrews, diameter of miniscrews, types of tooth movements, and variables that represent sagittal and vertical skeletal relationships (ANB, FMA, and Sn-GoGn). The operator's learning curve, patient's age, area (midpalatal or parapalatal), and splinting significantly influenced the success rates. After adjusting for other variables, only 1- splinting-showed a significant effect on the success rate.
CONCLUSIONS: The joining of 2 miniscrews by splinting, placement of the miniscrew in the midpalatal suture, patient's age (especially >15 years), and operator's skill were factors influencing the clinical success of orthodontic miniscrews in the palate. Copyright 2010 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20122433     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.11.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  15 in total

1.  Orthopedic outcomes of hybrid and conventional Hyrax expanders.

Authors:  Daniela Garib; Felicia Miranda; Juan Martin Palomo; Fernando Pugliese; José Carlos da Cunha Bastos; Alexandre Magno Dos Santos; Guilherme Janson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Insertion torque values and success rates for paramedian insertion of orthodontic mini-implants : A retrospective study.

Authors:  Bruno Di Leonardo; Björn Ludwig; Jörg Alexander Lisson; Luca Contardo; Rossano Mura; Jan Hourfar
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Effects of monocortical and bicortical mini-implant anchorage on bone-borne palatal expansion using finite element analysis.

Authors:  Robert J Lee; Won Moon; Christine Hong
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Comparison of anchorage reinforcement with temporary anchorage devices or a Herbst appliance during lingual orthodontic protraction of mandibular molars without maxillary counterbalance extraction.

Authors:  Rebecca Metzner; Rainer Schwestka-Polly; Hans-Joachim Helms; Dirk Wiechmann
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 2.151

5.  Analysis of midpalatal miniscrew-assisted maxillary molar distalization patterns with simultaneous use of fixed appliances: A preliminary study.

Authors:  Su-Jung Mah; Ji-Eun Kim; Eun Jin Ahn; Jong-Hyun Nam; Ji-Young Kim; Yoon-Goo Kang
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 1.372

6.  Evaluation of primary stability of innovated orthodontic miniscrew system (STS): An ex-vivo study.

Authors:  Massoud Seifi; Negin-Sadat Matini
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2016-07-01

7.  Mini-implants in the palatal slope--a retrospective analysis of implant survival and tissue reaction.

Authors:  Thomas Ziebura; Stefanie Flieger; Dirk Wiechmann
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 2.151

8.  Effectiveness of en-masse retraction using midpalatal miniscrews and a modified transpalatal arch: Treatment duration and dentoskeletal changes.

Authors:  Jungkil Lee; Ken Miyazawa; Masako Tabuchi; Takuma Sato; Misuzu Kawaguchi; Shigemi Goto
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 1.372

9.  Comparison of maxillary molar distalization with an implant-supported distal jet and a traditional tooth-supported distal jet appliance.

Authors:  Mauro Cozzani; Marco Pasini; Francesco Zallio; Robert Ritucci; Sabrina Mutinelli; Laura Mazzotta; Maria Rita Giuca; Vincenzo Piras
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2014-06-11

10.  Temporary anchorage device usage: a survey among Swiss orthodontists.

Authors:  Goran Markic; Christos Katsaros; Nikolaos Pandis; Theodore Eliades
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.