Literature DB >> 20122432

Effectiveness of the cervical vertebral maturation method to predict postpeak circumpubertal growth of craniofacial structures.

Piotr Fudalej1, Anne-Marie Bollen.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to assess effectiveness of the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method to predict circumpubertal craniofacial growth in the postpeak period.
METHODS: The CVM stage was determined in 176 subjects (51 adolescent boys and 125 adolescent girls) on cephalograms taken at the end of treatment (T2; mean ages, 15.75 years [boys] and 15.23 years [girls]) in subjects from the postretention database at the University of Washington in Seattle. Craniofacial growth was evaluated from the following measurements on cephalograms at T2 and end of follow-up (T3) (mean ages, 29.01 years [men] and 28.08 years [women]): condylion to gnathion, condylion to gonion, gonion to gnathion, sella to gnathion, nasion to menton, anterior nasal spine to menton, and sella to gonion. The change of each variable from T2 to T3 was assessed with paired t tests. Parametric (t tests or analysis of variance [ANOVA]) or nonparametric (Mann-Whitney or Kruskal-Wallis) tests were used to detect intergroup differences.
RESULTS: One hundred eight subjects (35 boys, 73 girls) demonstrated CVM stage 3, 56 (16 boys, 40 girls) were in CVM stage 4, and 12 (all girls) were in CVM stage 5 at T2. Intrasex comparisons showed that boys in CVM stages 3 and 4 could be differentiated regarding changes of all variables. In the girls, only those in CVM stages 3 and 4 could be differentiated based on the amount of changes of 2 measurements: condylion to gonion and sella to gonion. Intersex comparisons showed that boys in CVM stage 3 had significantly more changes than girls (P <0.01). Boys in CVM stage 4 showed significant differences compared with girls in CVM stage 4 for only 2 variables (sella to gonion and condylion to gonion; P <0.001 and P = 0.012, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The CVM method was modestly effective in determining the amount of postpeak circumpubertal craniofacial growth. Copyright 2010 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20122432     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.01.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  10 in total

1.  Accuracy and repeatability of computer aided cervical vertebra landmarking in cephalogram.

Authors:  Lili Chen; Zhicong Lan; Xiangyang Xu; Jiuxiang Lin; Huaifei Hu
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2012-01-27

2.  Are cervical vertebrae suitable for age estimation?

Authors:  B Gelbrich; M Fischer; A Stellzig-Eisenhauer; G Gelbrich
Journal:  J Forensic Odontostomatol       Date:  2017-12-01

3.  Validity and reliability of a method for assessment of cervical vertebral maturation.

Authors:  Xiao-Guang Zhao; Jiuxiang Lin; Jiu-Hui Jiang; Qingzhu Wang; Sut Hong Ng
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Geometric morphometric analysis of craniofacial variation, ontogeny and modularity in a cross-sectional sample of modern humans.

Authors:  H L L Wellens; A M Kuijpers-Jagtman; D J Halazonetis
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Evaluation of the Artificial Neural Network and Naive Bayes Models Trained with Vertebra Ratios for Growth and Development Determination.

Authors:  Hatice Kök; Mehmet Said İzgi; Ayşe Merve Acılar
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2020-12-02

Review 6.  Reliability of Growth Indicators and Efficiency of Functional Treatment for Skeletal Class II Malocclusion: Current Evidence and Controversies.

Authors:  Giuseppe Perinetti; Luca Contardo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Usage and comparison of artificial intelligence algorithms for determination of growth and development by cervical vertebrae stages in orthodontics.

Authors:  Hatice Kök; Ayse Merve Acilar; Mehmet Said İzgi
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 2.750

8.  Evaluation of maxillary and mandibular growth patterns with cephalometric analysis based on cervical vertebral maturation: A Japanese cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Asuka Manabe; Takayoshi Ishida; Eiichiro Kanda; Takashi Ono
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Formula for cervical vertebral bone age of Vietnamese people from 7 to 18 years old.

Authors:  ThuyTrang Thi Ho; Loc Minh Lu; QuynhTam Thi Luong
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2022-01-29

10.  Predicting mandibular growth increment on the basis of cervical vertebral dimensions in Iranian girls.

Authors:  Mahkameh Moshfeghi; Hajir Rahimi; Hoda Rahimi; Mahtab Nouri; Alireza Akbarzadeh Bagheban
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 2.750

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.