Literature DB >> 20122418

Class III camouflage treatment: what are the limits?

Nikia R Burns1, David R Musich, Chris Martin, Thomas Razmus, Erdogan Gunel, Peter Ngan.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine the skeletal, dental, and soft-tissue changes in response to camouflage Class III treatment.
METHODS: Thirty patients (average age, 12.4 + or - 1.0 years) with skeletal Class III malocclusions who completed comprehensive nonextraction orthodontic treatment were studied. Skeletal, dental, and soft-tissue changes were determined by using published cephalometric analyses. The quality of orthodontic treatment was standardized by registering the peer assessment rating index on the pretreatment and posttreatment study models. The change in the level of gingival attachment with treatment was determined on the study casts. The results were compared with a group of untreated subjects. Data were analyzed with repeated measures analysis and paired t tests.
RESULTS: The average change in the Wits appraisal was greater in the treated group (1.2 + or - 0.1 mm) than in the control group (-0.5 + or - 0.3 mm). The average peer assessment rating index score improved from 33.5 to 4.1. No significant differences were found for the level of gingival attachments between the treatment and control groups. The sagittal jaw relationship (ANB angle) did not improve with camouflage treatment. A wide range of tooth movements compensated for the skeletal changes in both groups. The upper and lower limits for incisal movement to compensate for Class III skeletal changes were 120 degrees to the sella-nasion line and 80 degrees to the mandibular plane, respectively. Greater increases in the angle of convexity were found in the treated group, indicating improved facial profiles. Greater increases in length of the upper lip were found in the treated group, corresponding to the changes in the hard tissues with treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant dental and soft-tissue changes can be expected in young Class III patients treated with camouflage orthodontic tooth movement. A wide range of skeletal dysplasias can be camouflaged with tooth movement without deleterious effects to the periodontium. However, proper diagnosis and realistic treatment objectives are necessary to prevent undesirable sequelae. Copyright 2010 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20122418     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.05.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  15 in total

1.  Three-dimensional treatment planning for maxillary and mandibular segmental surgery for an adult Class III: Where old meets new.

Authors:  R Scott Conley; Sean P Edwards
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Quantitative comparison of incisal tooth wear in patients receiving one-phase or two-phase treatment for skeletal Class III malocclusion with anterior crossbite.

Authors:  So-Jeong Jang; Dong-Soon Choi; Insan Jang; Paul-Georg Jost-Brinkmann; Bong-Kuen Cha
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Treatment decision of camouflage or surgical orthodontic treatment for skeletal Class III patients based on analysis of masticatory function.

Authors:  Nobuhiko Kawai; Masahiko Watanabe; Manami Shibata; Shinya Horiuchi; Kenji Fushima; Eiji Tanaka
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 3.719

4.  Very early orthodontic treatment: when, why and how?

Authors:  Ute E M Schneider-Moser; Lorenz Moser
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2022-06-10

5.  Orthodontic decompensation in skeletal Class III malocclusion: redefining the amount of movement assessed by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.

Authors:  José Antonio Zuega Cappellozza; Fabio Pinto Guedes; Hugo Nary Filho; Leopoldino Capelozza Filho; Mauricio de Almeida Cardoso
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015-10

6.  Skeletal anteroposterior discrepancy and vertical type effects on lower incisor preoperative decompensation and postoperative compensation in skeletal Class III patients.

Authors:  Hyo-Won Ahn; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Compensatory orthodontic treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion with anterior crossbite.

Authors:  José Valladares Neto
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb

8.  Lower incisor dentoalveolar compensation and symphysis dimensions among Class I and III malocclusion patients with different facial vertical skeletal patterns.

Authors:  Núria Molina-Berlanga; Jaume Llopis-Perez; Carlos Flores-Mir; Andreu Puigdollers
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Management of the Class III malocclusion treated with maxillary expansion, facemask therapy and corrective orthodontic. A 15-year follow-up.

Authors:  Renato Rodrigues de Almeida; Luiz Eduardo Alessio; Renata Rodrigues de Almeida-Pedrin; Marcio Rodrigues de Almeida; Arnaldo Pinzan; Luiz Sérgio Vieira
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

10.  Two-Step Extraction of the Lower First Molar for Class III Treatment in Adult Patient.

Authors:  Kélei Cristina de Mathias Almeida; Ricardo Fabris Paulin; Taísa Barnabé Raveli; Dirceu Barnabé Raveli; Ary Santos-Pinto
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2016-09-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.