Literature DB >> 20122369

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of quetiapine and lithium monotherapy in adults in the acute phase of bipolar depression (EMBOLDEN I).

Allan H Young1, Susan L McElroy, Michael Bauer, Nabil Philips, William Chang, Bengt Olausson, Björn Paulsson, Martin Brecher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of quetiapine and lithium monotherapy with that of placebo for a major depressive episode in bipolar disorder.
METHOD: 802 patients with DSM-IV-defined bipolar disorder (499 bipolar I, 303 bipolar II) were randomly allocated to quetiapine 300 mg/d (n = 265), quetiapine 600 mg/d (n = 268), lithium 600 to 1800 mg/d (n = 136), or placebo (n = 133) for 8 weeks. Primary endpoint was the change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score. The study was conducted from August 2005 to May 2007.
RESULTS: Mean MADRS total score change from baseline at week 8 was -15.4 for quetiapine 300 mg/d, -16.1 for quetiapine 600 mg/d, -13.6 for lithium, and -11.8 for placebo (P < .001 for both quetiapine doses, P = .123 for lithium, vs placebo). Quetiapine 600 mg/d was significantly more effective than lithium in improving MADRS total score at week 8 (P = .013). Quetiapine-treated (both doses), but not lithium-treated, patients showed significant improvements (P < .05) in MADRS response and remission rates, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Clinical Global Impressions-Bipolar-Severity of Illness and -Change, and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) scores at week 8 versus placebo. Both quetiapine doses were more effective than lithium at week 8 on the HDRS and HARS. The most common adverse events were somnolence, dry mouth, and dizziness with quetiapine (both doses) and nausea with lithium.
CONCLUSIONS: Quetiapine (300 or 600 mg/d) was more effective than placebo for the treatment of episodes of acute depression in bipolar disorder. Lithium did not significantly differ from placebo on the main measures of efficacy. Both treatments were generally well tolerated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00206141. Copyright 2010 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20122369     DOI: 10.4088/JCP.08m04995gre

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  74 in total

Review 1.  Review of evidence for use of antidepressants in bipolar depression.

Authors:  Shane J McInerney; Sidney H Kennedy
Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord       Date:  2014-10-16

2.  Efficacy and safety of quetiapine extended release monotherapy in bipolar depression: a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Huafang Li; Niufan Gu; Hongyan Zhang; Gang Wang; Qingrong Tan; Fude Yang; Yuping Ning; Honggeng Zhang; Zheng Lu; Xiufeng Xu; Jianguo Shi; Chengge Gao; Lingjiang Li; Kerang Zhang; Hongjun Tian; Xiaoping Wang; Keqing Li; Huichun Li; Yi Xu; Shiping Xie; Xin Yu
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Efficacy and safety of extended-release quetiapine fumarate in youth with bipolar depression: an 8 week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Robert L Findling; Sanjeev Pathak; Willie R Earley; Sherry Liu; Melissa P DelBello
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 2.576

Review 4.  Treatment of Bipolar Disorder in a Lifetime Perspective: Is Lithium Still the Best Choice?

Authors:  Gabriele Sani; Giulio Perugi; Leonardo Tondo
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 5.  Pharmacological treatment of bipolar depression: qualitative systematic review of double-blind randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Lucas Spanemberg; Raffael Massuda; Lucas Lovato; Leonardo Paim; Edgar Arrua Vares; Neusa Sica da Rocha; Keila Maria Mendes Ceresér
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2012-06

Review 6.  The International College of Neuro-Psychopharmacology (CINP) Treatment Guidelines for Bipolar Disorder in Adults (CINP-BD-2017), Part 2: Review, Grading of the Evidence, and a Precise Algorithm.

Authors:  Konstantinos N Fountoulakis; Lakshmi Yatham; Heinz Grunze; Eduard Vieta; Allan Young; Pierre Blier; Siegfried Kasper; Hans Jurgen Moeller
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 5.176

7.  A randomized pilot study of psychotherapy and quetiapine for the acute treatment of bipolar II depression.

Authors:  Holly A Swartz; Ellen Frank; Yu Cheng
Journal:  Bipolar Disord       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.744

8.  A critical appraisal of treatments for bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Andrew A Nierenberg
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2010

Review 9.  A report on older-age bipolar disorder from the International Society for Bipolar Disorders Task Force.

Authors:  Martha Sajatovic; Sergio A Strejilevich; Ariel G Gildengers; Annemiek Dols; Rayan K Al Jurdi; Brent P Forester; Lars Vedel Kessing; John Beyer; Facundo Manes; Soham Rej; Adriane R Rosa; Sigfried Ntm Schouws; Shang-Ying Tsai; Robert C Young; Kenneth I Shulman
Journal:  Bipolar Disord       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 6.744

Review 10.  Intracellular Signaling Cascades in Bipolar Disorder.

Authors:  Gregory H Jones; Carola Rong; Aisha S Shariq; Abhinav Mishra; Rodrigo Machado-Vieira
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.