Literature DB >> 20122112

What does the history of technology regulation teach us about nano oversight?

Gary E Marchant1, Douglas J Sylvester, Kenneth W Abbott.   

Abstract

As policy makers struggle to develop regulatory oversight models for nanotechnologies, there are important lessons that can be drawn from previous attempts to govern other emerging technologies. Five such lessons are the following: (1) public confidence and trust in a technology and its regulatory oversight is probably the most important factor for the commercial success of a technology; (2) regulation should avoid discriminating against particular technologies unless there is a scientifically based rationale for the disparate treatment; (3) regulatory systems need to be flexible and adaptive to rapidly changing technologies; (4) ethical and social concerns of the public about emerging technologies need to be expressly acknowledged and addressed in regulatory oversight; and (5) international harmonization of regulation may be beneficial in a rapidly globalizing world.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20122112     DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2009.00443.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Law Med Ethics        ISSN: 1073-1105            Impact factor:   1.718


  2 in total

1.  Introduction: the challenge of nanomedicine human subjects research: protecting participants, workers, bystanders, and the environment.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.718

Review 2.  Nanotechnology-supported THz medical imaging.

Authors:  Andreas Stylianou; Michael A Talias
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2013-03-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.