Literature DB >> 20121683

Are patients willing participants in the new wave of community-based medical education in regional and rural Australia?

J Nicky Hudson1, Kathryn M Weston, Elizabeth E Farmer, Rowena G Ivers, Russell W Pearson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Community-based medical education is growing to meet the increased demand for quality clinical education in expanded settings, and its sustainability relies on patient participation. This study investigated patients' views on being used as an educational resource for teaching medical students.
DESIGN: Questionnaire-based survey. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients attending six rural and 11 regional general practices in New South Wales over 18 teaching sessions in November 2008, who consented to student involvement in their consultation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient perceptions, expectations and acceptance of medical student involvement in consultations, assessed by surveys before and after their consultations.
RESULTS: 118 of 122 patients consented to medical student involvement; of these, 117 (99%) completed a survey before the consultation, and 100 (85%) after the consultation. Patients were overwhelmingly positive about their doctor and practice being involved in student teaching and felt they themselves played an important role. Pre-consultation, patients expressed reluctance to allow students to conduct some or all aspects of the consultation independently. However, after the consultation, they reported they would have accepted higher levels of involvement than actually occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients in regional and rural settings were willing partners in developing skills of junior medical students, who had greater involvement in patient consultations than previously reported for urban students. Our study extends the findings from urban general practice that patients are underutilised partners in community-based medical training. The support of patients from regional and rural settings could facilitate the expansion of primary care-based medical education in these areas of workforce need.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20121683     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03454.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  7 in total

1.  Engaging rural preceptors in new longitudinal community clerkships during workforce shortage: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Judith N Hudson; Kathryn M Weston; Elizabeth A Farmer
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 2.497

2.  Using a framework to implement large-scale innovation in medical education with the intent of achieving sustainability.

Authors:  Judith N Hudson; Elizabeth A Farmer; Kathryn M Weston; John A Bushnell
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Patient participation in medical student teaching: a survey of hospital patients.

Authors:  Nathan G Rockey; Guilherme Piovezani Ramos; Susan Romanski; Dennis Bierle; Matthew Bartlett; Magnus Halland
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Patient perceptions of innovative longitudinal integrated clerkships based in regional, rural and remote primary care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Judith N Hudson; Patricia J Knight; Kathryn M Weston
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 2.497

5.  Patients' attitudes towards medical students in a teaching family practice: a sri lankan experience.

Authors:  R P J C Ramanayake; W L A H Sumathipala; I M S M Rajakaruna; D P N Ariyapala
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2012-07

6.  "Thank You for Giving Me a Voice!" A Longitudinal Evaluation of Patients' Experience of Partnering With Students in an Australian Medical School.

Authors:  Kimberley Dale Ivory; Georgina Luscombe; Linda Ann Klein; Alexandra Barratt
Journal:  J Med Educ Curric Dev       Date:  2017-03-15

7.  Evaluation of the undergraduate family medicine programme of Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya: quantitative and qualitative student feedback.

Authors:  D P Perera; S S Withana; K Mendis; D V T Kasunjith; W T S Jayathilaka; S Wickramasuriya
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.463

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.