Literature DB >> 20121308

Do curved reaching movements emerge from competing perceptions? A reply to van der Wel et al. (2009).

Michael J Spivey1, Rick Dale, Guenther Knoblich, Marc Grosjean.   

Abstract

Spivey, Grosjean, and Knoblich (2005) reported smoothly curved reaching movements, via computer-mouse tracking, which suggested a continuously evolving flow of distributed lexical activation patterns into motor movement during a phonological competitor task. For example, when instructed to click the "candy," participants' mouse-cursor trajectories curved conspicuously toward a picture of a candle before landing on the picture of the candy. In their commentary on this work, van der Wel, Eder, Mitchel, Walsh, and Rosenbaum (2009) describe a quantitative simulation of reaching movements that stands as an existence proof that a discrete-processing speech perception system can feed into a continuous-processing motor movement system to produce reach trajectories similar to that observed by Spivey et al. In this reply, we describe eye-tracking evidence, new mouse-tracking evidence, and a dynamic version of van der Wel et al's simulation, all of which suggest that competing perceptual representations may instigate the preparation of multiple movement plans that are merged in a dynamically weighted average, thus producing a single smoothly curved movement. Like van der Wel et al., we are optimistic that an emphasis on the computational linking hypothesis between hypothesized perceptual representations and recorded motor movements will elucidate the discrete versus continuous aspects of perceptual, cognitive, and motor processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20121308     DOI: 10.1037/a0017170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  10 in total

1.  Mouse-tracking evidence for parallel anticipatory option evaluation.

Authors:  Edward A Cranford; Jarrod Moss
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-12-23

2.  Assessing a continuum of lexical-semantic knowledge in the second year of life: A multimodal approach.

Authors:  Kristi Hendrickson; Diane Poulin-Dubois; Pascal Zesiger; Margaret Friend
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2017-02-24

3.  Competitive processes in cross-situational word learning.

Authors:  Daniel Yurovsky; Chen Yu; Linda B Smith
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-04-22

4.  Hand in motion reveals mind in motion.

Authors:  Jonathan B Freeman; Rick Dale; Thomas A Farmer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-04-20

5.  Tracking second thoughts: continuous and discrete revision processes during visual lexical decision.

Authors:  Laura Barca; Giovanni Pezzulo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Embodied choice: how action influences perceptual decision making.

Authors:  Nathan F Lepora; Giovanni Pezzulo
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  A State Space Approach to Dynamic Modeling of Mouse-Tracking Data.

Authors:  Antonio Calcagnì; Luigi Lombardi; Marco D'Alessandro; Francesca Freuli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-12-17

8.  The dynamics of decision-making and action during active sampling.

Authors:  Duygu Ozbagci; Ruben Moreno-Bote; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  It Takes a Village: Using Network Science to Identify the Effect of Individual Differences in Bilingual Experience for Theory of Mind.

Authors:  Ester Navarro; Vincent DeLuca; Eleonora Rossi
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-04-09

10.  Grammatical aspect and temporal distance in motion descriptions.

Authors:  Sarah E Anderson; Teenie Matlock; Michael Spivey
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-07-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.