Literature DB >> 20121291

Attentional capture with rapidly changing attentional control settings.

Mei-Ching Lien1, Eric Ruthruff, James C Johnston.   

Abstract

The classic theory of spatial attention hypothesized 2 modes, voluntary and involuntary. Folk, Remington, and Johnston (1992) reported that even involuntary attention capture by stimuli requires a match between stimulus properties and what the observer is looking for. This surprising conclusion has been confirmed by many subsequent studies. In these studies, however, the observer typically looks for the same property throughout an entire session. Real-world behavior, in contrast, often requires frequent shifts in attentional set. The present study examined whether such shifts weaken attentional settings, allowing task-irrelevant objects to capture attention. Surprisingly, fluctuating control settings did not increase vulnerability to capture by salient stimuli (color singletons and abrupt onsets). We conclude that the attention control system is remarkably flexible, able to rapidly and fully adopt new settings and abandon old settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20121291     DOI: 10.1037/a0015875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  30 in total

1.  Value-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Patryk A Laurent; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Reward and attentional control in visual search.

Authors:  Steven Yantis; Brian A Anderson; Emma K Wampler; Patryk A Laurent
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  2012

3.  A meta-analysis of contingent-capture effects.

Authors:  Christian Büsel; Martin Voracek; Ulrich Ansorge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-08-31

4.  Searching for two things at once: establishment of multiple attentional control settings on a trial-by-trial basis.

Authors:  Zachary J J Roper; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

Review 5.  A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Value-driven attentional and oculomotor capture during goal-directed, unconstrained viewing.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Getting it right from the start: Attentional control settings without a history of target selection.

Authors:  Maria Giammarco; Lindsay Plater; Jack Hryciw; Naseem Al-Aidroos
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 8.  Controlled information processing, automaticity, and the burden of proof.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

9.  Immunity to attentional capture at ignored locations.

Authors:  Eric Ruthruff; Nicholas Gaspelin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Oculomotor Inhibition of Salient Distractors: Voluntary Inhibition Cannot Override Selection History.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; John M Gaspar; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2019-04-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.