Literature DB >> 20120806

Intraspecific competition between co-infecting parasite strains enhances host survival in African trypanosomes.

Oliver Balmer1, Stephen Curtis Stearns, Andreas Schötzau, Reto Brun.   

Abstract

It is becoming increasingly clear that under natural conditions parasitic infections commonly consist of co-infections with multiple conspecific strains. Multiple-strain infections lead to intraspecific interactions and may have important ecological and evolutionary effects on both hosts and parasites. However, experimental evidence on intraspecific competition or facilitation in infections has been scarce because of the technical challenges of distinguishing and tracking individual co-infecting strains. To overcome this limitation, we engineered transgenic strains of the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma brucei, the causal agent of human African sleeping sickness. Different strains were transfected with fluorescence genes of different colors to make them visually distinguishable in order to investigate the effects of multiple-strain infections on parasite population dynamics and host fitness. We infected mice either with each strain alone or with mixes of two strains. Our results show a strong mutual competitive suppression of co-infecting T. brucei strains very early in infection. This mutual suppression changes within-host parasite dynamics and alleviates the effects of infection on the host. The strength of suppression depends on the density of the co-infecting strain, and differences in life-history traits between the strains determine the consequences of strain-strain competition for the host. Unexpectedly, co-infection with a less virulent strain significantly enhances host survival (+15%). Analysis of the strain dynamics reveals that this is due to the suppression of the density of the more virulent strain (-33%), whose degree of impact ultimately determines the physical condition of the host. The competitive suppression is likely caused by allelopathic interference or by apparent competition mediated by strain-specific immune responses. These findings highlight the importance of intraspecific variation for parasite-parasite and parasite-host interactions. To fully understand parasite and disease dynamics, the genetic diversity of infections must be taken into account. Through changes in parasite dynamics, intraspecific variation may further affect transmission dynamics and select for increased virulence of each strain. The precise mechanisms underlying mutual suppression are not yet understood but may be exploitable to fight this devastating parasite. Our results are therefore not only of basic ecological interest investigating an important form of intraspecific competition, but may also have applied relevance for public health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20120806     DOI: 10.1890/08-2291.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  39 in total

Review 1.  Within-host competitive interactions as a mechanism for the maintenance of parasite diversity.

Authors:  Farrah Bashey
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Biogeographical patterns and co-occurrence of pathogenic infection across island populations of Berthelot's pipit (Anthus berthelotii).

Authors:  Lewis G Spurgin; Juan Carlos Illera; David P Padilla; David S Richardson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  The evolutionary ecology of complex lifecycle parasites: linking phenomena with mechanisms.

Authors:  S K J R Auld; M C Tinsley
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Pathogen diversity and hidden regimes of apparent competition.

Authors:  Sarah Cobey; Marc Lipsitch
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 5.  The potential impact of coinfection on antimicrobial chemotherapy and drug resistance.

Authors:  Ruthie B Birger; Roger D Kouyos; C Jessica E Metcalf; Ted Cohen; Emily C Griffiths; Silvie Huijben; Michael J Mina; Victoriya Volkova; Bryan Grenfell
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 17.079

6.  Competition and the evolution of reproductive restraint in malaria parasites.

Authors:  Laura C Pollitt; Nicole Mideo; Damien R Drew; Petra Schneider; Nick Colegrave; Sarah E Reece
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  ATP-driven and AMPK-independent autophagy in an early branching eukaryotic parasite.

Authors:  Feng-Jun Li; Zhi-Shen Xu; Andy D S Soo; Zhao-Rong Lun; Cynthia Y He
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 16.016

Review 8.  Social parasites.

Authors:  Miguel A Lopez; HoangKim T Nguyen; Michael Oberholzer; Kent L Hill
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 7.934

9.  Bottlenecks and the maintenance of minor genotypes during the life cycle of Trypanosoma brucei.

Authors:  Michael Oberle; Oliver Balmer; Reto Brun; Isabel Roditi
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 6.823

10.  Competition between strains of Borrelia afzelii inside the rodent host and the tick vector.

Authors:  Dolores Genné; Anouk Sarr; Andrea Gomez-Chamorro; Jonas Durand; Claire Cayol; Olivier Rais; Maarten J Voordouw
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.