Literature DB >> 20119678

Decolonization of orthopedic surgical team S. aureus carriers: impact on surgical-site infections.

M Portigliatti Barbos1, Barbara Mognetti, S Pecoraro, W Picco, V Veglio.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Orthopedic surgical-site infection (SSI), mostly due to S. aureus, is recognized as a major adverse event. This research aims to verify the usefulness of surgical team decolonization in order to reduce the risk of surgical-site infection.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed swabs of both nares and oropharynx to identify S. aureus carriers among orthopedic team members who consented to cooperate with the study. Carriers were treated with local application of mupirocin ointment.
RESULTS: Retrospective study of 1,000 consecutive patients operated before surgical team decolonization showed 6 per thousand SSIs. Of the 300 cases considered after decolonization, none developed SSI.
CONCLUSIONS: Though we are aware that more data need to be collected, this work might be relevant for the introduction of a new preventive protocol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20119678      PMCID: PMC2837811          DOI: 10.1007/s10195-010-0081-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 1590-9921


Introduction

Surgical-site infections (SSIs) are a major adverse event for patients and their surgeons. Orthopedic SSIs cause substantial morbidity, prolonging hospital stay by a median of 2 weeks, doubling rehospitalization rates, and more than tripling overall healthcare costs [1]. Staphylococcus aureus is the most important pathogen after surgical procedures, and its nasal carriage is the main risk factor for SSI caused by S. aureus [2], since carriers are two to nine times more likely to acquire S. aureus SSIs than noncarriers [3]. The mean carriage rate in the general population is 37.2% [3]. Several studies have been conducted on nasal decolonization in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery by using perioperative intranasal mupirocin [4, 5], an attractive prevention strategy, being a safe and simple method to eradicate nasal colonization. Preoperative patient decolonization significantly decreases incidence of S. aureus SSIs [4, 5]. Nevertheless, no experience is documented regarding surgical team screening for S. aureus carriers and the use of perioperative mupirocin for decolonization in order to extend the prophylaxis against S. aureus orthopedic SSIs. Therefore, the focus of this study is the role of the surgical team as a possible risk factor for SSI and to suggest a suitable and comprehensive protocol for prevention.

Materials and methods

In order to establish the frequency of S. aureus nasal carriers among orthopedic surgical team members operating within 2 m from the surgical site, we performed swabs of both nares and oropharynx on 75 workers of the operating theater (orthopedic surgeons, anesthesiologists and nurses) who provided informed consent to be enrolled in the study. Each collection swab was streaked onto S. aureus-selective mannitol salt agar plates, incubated for 24 h at 37°C, and examined for growth. According to swab results, carriers were treated with daily nasal application of mupirocin ointment (Glaxo) for 5 days. The treatment was repeated 6 months later. Results of mupirocin treatment were checked 3 months after treatment by repeating swabs of both nares and oropharynx. SSIs in both pre- and posttreatment groups were diagnosed through wound swab and cultural examination in presence of altered clinical and biohumoral parameters.

Results

Thirty out of 75 (40%) swabs resulted positive for presence of S. aureus. Susceptibility testing on the isolated bacteria indicated that, while none of the carriers was mupirocin resistant, 23/30 produced β-lactamase (therefore being penicillin resistant) and 5/30 were oxacillin resistant (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Percentage of S. aureus carriers in the screened population of orthopedic surgical team members (a) and antibiotic resistance in the isolated bacterial colonies (b)

Percentage of S. aureus carriers in the screened population of orthopedic surgical team members (a) and antibiotic resistance in the isolated bacterial colonies (b) Despite mupirocin application, one surgeon appeared positive 3 months after treatment, and was therefore excluded from the study. In a second step of this study we compared the rate of S. aureus SSIs in two series of patients operated before (1,000 patients, retrospective analysis) and after (300 patients) decolonization of surgical teams. All 75 team members, both carriers and noncarriers, had to be considered because of the variable composition of the surgical teams. Retrospective study on 1,000 consecutive patients operated before nasal decolonization of the surgical team showed 6‰ SSIs. Of the 300 cases considered after nasal decolonization, none developed SSI (p = 0.439 Kruskall–Wallis test). Operations were distributed as presented in Table 1. The two considered groups are equivalent.
Table 1

Distribution of operations within the two considered groups

PretreatmentPosttreatment
NumberPercentage (%)NumberPercentage (%)
Hip-knee prosthesis404134.3
Shoulder-knee arthroscopy51551.516755.7
Foot surgery696.9268.7
Hand surgery210216722.3
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction616.1206.7
Other10510.572.3
Total1,000300

Values are expressed as approximate number and as percentage. Groups are equivalent in composition

Distribution of operations within the two considered groups Values are expressed as approximate number and as percentage. Groups are equivalent in composition

Discussion

This preliminary study shows for the first time how a prophylactic intervention on the surgical team can decrease the SSI rate. Though we are aware that various problems still have to be solved (such as intermittent carriers and possible false negatives, the duration of decolonization efficacy and the appearance of resistance to treatment) and that more data need to be collected to reinforce statistical analysis, we consider this prophylactic approach to be promising and worth being introduced into daily surgical practice. In accordance with published statistics [3], our work confirms the presence of 40% S. aureus carriers in surgical teams, thus emphasizing the importance of decolonization treatment not only for patients but—probably even more strikingly—for health workers in the operating theater. According to the CDC Guideline for Prevention of SSI, healthcare organizations have to implement policies to prevent transmission of microorganisms from personnel to patients [6]. This work might be relevant for the development of preventive protocols and guidelines for the introduction of this kind of prophylaxis to reduce SSIs.
  6 in total

1.  Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus is a major risk factor for surgical-site infections in orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  M D Kalmeijer; E van Nieuwland-Bollen; D Bogaers-Hofman; G A de Baere
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.254

2.  Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.

Authors:  A J Mangram; T C Horan; M L Pearson; L C Silver; W R Jarvis
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 3.  Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology, underlying mechanisms, and associated risks.

Authors:  J Kluytmans; A van Belkum; H Verbrugh
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  The impact of surgical-site infections following orthopedic surgery at a community hospital and a university hospital: adverse quality of life, excess length of stay, and extra cost.

Authors:  James D Whitehouse; N Deborah Friedman; Kathryn B Kirkland; William J Richardson; Daniel J Sexton
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.254

5.  Prophylactic mupirocin could reduce orthopedic wound infections. 1,044 patients treated with mupirocin compared with 1,260 historical controls.

Authors:  A J Gernaat-van der Sluis; A M Hoogenboom-Verdegaal; P J Edixhoven; N H Spies-van Rooijen
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1998-08

6.  Use of perioperative mupirocin to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) orthopaedic surgical site infections.

Authors:  M H Wilcox; J Hall; H Pike; P A Templeton; W N Fawley; P Parnell; P Verity
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.926

  6 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Current classification systems for adult degenerative scoliosis.

Authors:  C Faldini; A Di Martino; M De Fine; M T Miscione; C Calamelli; A Mazzotti; F Perna
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2013-04-04

Review 2.  Staphylococcus aureus screening and decolonization in orthopaedic surgery and reduction of surgical site infections.

Authors:  Antonia F Chen; Charles B Wessel; Nalini Rao
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Current preventive measures for health-care associated surgical site infections: a review.

Authors:  David M Tsai; Edward J Caterson
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2014-10-11

4.  General Assembly, Prevention, Operating Room - Personnel: Proceedings of International Consensus on Orthopedic Infections.

Authors:  Andrea Baldini; Kier Blevins; Daniel Del Gaizo; Oliver Enke; Karan Goswami; William Griffin; Pier Francesco Indelli; Toby Jennison; Eustathios Kenanidis; Paul Manner; Robin Patel; Teija Puhto; Parag Sancheti; Rahul Sharma; Rajeev Sharma; Rjajendra Shetty; Rami Sorial; Naasha Talati; T David Tarity; Kevin Tetsworth; Christos Topalis; Eleftherios Tsiridis; Annette W-Dahl; Matthew Wilson
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.757

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.