BACKGROUND: Severed donor heart lymphatics are not anastomosed to recipient lymphatics in cardiac transplantation. We evaluated the effects of cellular infiltrates of T cells and macrophages on the morphology of lymphatics in heart grafts. METHODS: Dark agouti hearts were transplanted to Lewis or control dark agouti rats on subtherapeutic doses of cyclosporin. Transplants were examined by immunohistology and quantitative immunofluorescence microscopy using lymphatic endothelial hyaluronan receptor-1 as a lymphatic marker and CD8 and CD68 as markers for cellular infiltration at selected intervals from 1 to 8 weeks posttransplantation. RESULTS: Allograft inner myocardial lymphatic density decreased by more than 30-fold at 1 week and recovered to only 15% of the native level at 8 weeks posttransplantation. In contrast, allograft lymphatics in and near the epicardium showed no significant density decline but increased in size by more than 5-fold at 2 weeks, and sustained approximately 3-fold increase at 8 weeks posttransplantation. Lymphatic changes correlated temporally with the extent of T cell and macrophage infiltration in allografts, which peaked at 2 to 3 weeks posttransplantation. When grafts were retransplanted from allogeneic to isogeneic recipients at 3 weeks posttransplantation, inner lymphatic density returned close to native level within 2 weeks after retransplantation. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first characterization of regional and morphologic effects of immunologic responses on heart lymphatics after transplantation. Elimination of alloimmune responses produces rapid restoration of inner lymphatic vessels, suggesting that lymphatics injured during rejection can recover when rejection is reversed during the posttransplantation course.
BACKGROUND: Severed donor heart lymphatics are not anastomosed to recipient lymphatics in cardiac transplantation. We evaluated the effects of cellular infiltrates of T cells and macrophages on the morphology of lymphatics in heart grafts. METHODS: Dark agouti hearts were transplanted to Lewis or control dark agouti rats on subtherapeutic doses of cyclosporin. Transplants were examined by immunohistology and quantitative immunofluorescence microscopy using lymphatic endothelial hyaluronan receptor-1 as a lymphatic marker and CD8 and CD68 as markers for cellular infiltration at selected intervals from 1 to 8 weeks posttransplantation. RESULTS: Allograft inner myocardial lymphatic density decreased by more than 30-fold at 1 week and recovered to only 15% of the native level at 8 weeks posttransplantation. In contrast, allograft lymphatics in and near the epicardium showed no significant density decline but increased in size by more than 5-fold at 2 weeks, and sustained approximately 3-fold increase at 8 weeks posttransplantation. Lymphatic changes correlated temporally with the extent of T cell and macrophage infiltration in allografts, which peaked at 2 to 3 weeks posttransplantation. When grafts were retransplanted from allogeneic to isogeneic recipients at 3 weeks posttransplantation, inner lymphatic density returned close to native level within 2 weeks after retransplantation. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first characterization of regional and morphologic effects of immunologic responses on heart lymphatics after transplantation. Elimination of alloimmune responses produces rapid restoration of inner lymphatic vessels, suggesting that lymphatics injured during rejection can recover when rejection is reversed during the posttransplantation course.
Authors: Susan Stewart; Gayle L Winters; Michael C Fishbein; Henry D Tazelaar; Jon Kobashigawa; Jacki Abrams; Claus B Andersen; Annalisa Angelini; Gerald J Berry; Margaret M Burke; Anthony J Demetris; Elizabeth Hammond; Silviu Itescu; Charles C Marboe; Bruce McManus; Elaine F Reed; Nancy L Reinsmoen; E Rene Rodriguez; Alan G Rose; Marlene Rose; Nicole Suciu-Focia; Adriana Zeevi; Margaret E Billingham Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2005-06-20 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Hans J Geissler; Alexey Dashkevich; Uwe M Fischer; Jochen W U Fries; Ferdinand Kuhn-Régnier; Klaus Addicks; Uwe Mehlhorn; Wilhelm Bloch Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2006-01-24 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Michael J Davis; Ann M Davis; Christine W Ku; Anatoliy A Gashev Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2008-11-21 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Y Ishikawa; Y Akishima-Fukasawa; K Ito; Y Akasaka; M Tanaka; R Shimokawa; M Kimura-Matsumoto; H Morita; S Sato; I Kamata; T Ishii Journal: Histopathology Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 5.087
Authors: Ye Cui; Kaifeng Liu; Maria E Monzon-Medina; Robert F Padera; Hao Wang; Gautam George; Demet Toprak; Elie Abdelnour; Emmanuel D'Agostino; Hilary J Goldberg; Mark A Perrella; Rosanna Malbran Forteza; Ivan O Rosas; Gary Visner; Souheil El-Chemaly Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2015-10-20 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Benjamin J Kopecky; Hao Dun; Junedh M Amrute; Chieh-Yu Lin; Andrea L Bredemeyer; Yuriko Terada; Peter O Bayguinov; Andrew L Koenig; Christian C Frye; James A J Fitzpatrick; Daniel Kreisel; Kory J Lavine Journal: Circulation Date: 2022-07-26 Impact factor: 39.918
Authors: Lindsey A Edwards; Anna K Nowocin; Nazila V Jafari; Lucy L Meader; Kathryn Brown; Aurélien Sarde; Carolyn Lam; Alex Murray; Wilson Wong Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-08-03 Impact factor: 29.690