Literature DB >> 20118619

History of dose response.

William J Waddell1.   

Abstract

An abbreviated history of the dose-response curve or chemical concentration-effect relationship is presented in this article. No attempt has been made to include all references on the subject. Just an outline, overview, and discussion of the most important eras are presented. The history of dose response may be divided roughly into three Eras, Preclassical, Classical, and Current. Paracelsus, who lived from 1493 to 1541, must be recognized as the first one to realize that dose was the most important issue to deal with in determining whether a chemical was toxic or not. However, that issue seems to have been forgotten and is still ignored by some. The Classical Era began about 1900 and ended about t; he time of the death of Gaddum in 1965, during which almost all of the progress had been made in solving the parameters to use in analyzing data. The Current Era began with the acceptance of the linearized multistage model in the mid-1970's. In this author's opinion, the biggest mistake in all of toxicology occurred with the acceptance and use of the linearized multistage for DNA-reactive carcinogens with dose on a linear scale. It had been clearly established in the Classical Era that dose should be plotted on a logarithmic scale. Plotting dose on a linear scale distorts the curve for low doses so that any attempt to detect the relationship of dose of carcinogen to carcinogenesis is impossible.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20118619     DOI: 10.2131/jts.35.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 0388-1350            Impact factor:   2.196


  7 in total

1.  Dose-Response Metabolomics To Understand Biochemical Mechanisms and Off-Target Drug Effects with the TOXcms Software.

Authors:  Cong-Hui Yao; Lingjue Wang; Ethan Stancliffe; Miriam Sindelar; Kevin Cho; Weitong Yin; Yahui Wang; Gary J Patti
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Cumulative Bullying Experiences, Adolescent Behavioral and Mental Health, and Academic Achievement: An Integrative Model of Perpetration, Victimization, and Bystander Behavior.

Authors:  Caroline B R Evans; Paul R Smokowski; Roderick A Rose; Melissa C Mercado; Khiya J Marshall
Journal:  J Child Fam Stud       Date:  2018-04-05

3.  Packaging and delivery of chemical weapons: a defensive trojan horse stratagem in chromodorid nudibranchs.

Authors:  Marianna Carbone; Margherita Gavagnin; Markus Haber; Yue-Wei Guo; Angelo Fontana; Emiliano Manzo; Gregory Genta-Jouve; Maria Tsoukatou; William B Rudman; Guido Cimino; Michael T Ghiselin; Ernesto Mollo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Assessing dose-response relationships for endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs): a focus on non-monotonicity.

Authors:  R Thomas Zoeller; Laura N Vandenberg
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 5.984

5.  Beyond new chemical entities: advancing drug development based on functional versatility of antibodies.

Authors:  Salvador Eugenio C Caoili
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Physiological Performance Curves: When Are They Useful?

Authors:  Alexander G Little; Frank Seebacher
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 7.  The dose response principle from philosophy to modern toxicology: The impact of ancient philosophy and medicine in modern toxicology science.

Authors:  A M Tsatsakis; L Vassilopoulou; L Kovatsi; C Tsitsimpikou; M Karamanou; G Leon; J Liesivuori; A W Hayes; D A Spandidos
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2018-10-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.