OBJECTIVES: The increase in erythromycin resistance among Streptococcus pyogenes isolates is a cause for concern. We analysed trends in macrolide resistance, phenotypes, genotypes, resistance determinants and transposons among erythromycin-resistant S. pyogenes isolates collected from adults in a Barcelona hospital (1993-2008). METHODS: Antibiotic susceptibility was studied by microdilution. Molecular typing was performed by PFGE, emm typing and multilocus sequence typing (MLST). Macrolide resistance genes and those related to the Tn916 family of transposons were detected by PCR. RESULTS: Ninety-nine (18.3%) of 541 isolates were erythromycin resistant. Erythromycin resistance rates progressively increased from 0% (0/24) in 1993-1994 to 34.2% (50/146, P < 0.001) in 2001-2004, then falling to 7.4% (8/108, P = 0.02) in 2007-2008. Sixty-six erythromycin-resistant isolates were available for molecular studies. Of these, 26 had an M phenotype [mef(A)] and 40 had an MLS(B) phenotype [erm(B), n = 33; and erm(TR), n = 7]. Among M-phenotype isolates, the most frequent genotypes (88.5%) were emm4-ST39, emm6-ST382 and emm75-ST49, whereas genotypes emm11-ST403, emm28-ST52 and emm25-ST350 accounted for 72.5% of MLS(B)-phenotype isolates. Twenty-five isolates harboured both erm(B) and tet(M) genes related to the Tn916 family of transposons, Tn6002 being the most frequent. Ten isolates (10.1%) were ciprofloxacin non-susceptible, related to the emm6-ST382 clone with a ParC S79A change. CONCLUSIONS: The peak of macrolide resistance rates among S. pyogenes observed in the 2001-2004 period was associated with an increase in the MLS(B) phenotype caused by the spread of emm11-ST403 and emm28-ST52 clones harbouring transposons of the Tn916 family. However, erythromycin resistance rates decreased significantly in the 2007-2008 period.
OBJECTIVES: The increase in erythromycin resistance among Streptococcus pyogenes isolates is a cause for concern. We analysed trends in macrolide resistance, phenotypes, genotypes, resistance determinants and transposons among erythromycin-resistant S. pyogenes isolates collected from adults in a Barcelona hospital (1993-2008). METHODS: Antibiotic susceptibility was studied by microdilution. Molecular typing was performed by PFGE, emm typing and multilocus sequence typing (MLST). Macrolide resistance genes and those related to the Tn916 family of transposons were detected by PCR. RESULTS: Ninety-nine (18.3%) of 541 isolates were erythromycin resistant. Erythromycin resistance rates progressively increased from 0% (0/24) in 1993-1994 to 34.2% (50/146, P < 0.001) in 2001-2004, then falling to 7.4% (8/108, P = 0.02) in 2007-2008. Sixty-six erythromycin-resistant isolates were available for molecular studies. Of these, 26 had an M phenotype [mef(A)] and 40 had an MLS(B) phenotype [erm(B), n = 33; and erm(TR), n = 7]. Among M-phenotype isolates, the most frequent genotypes (88.5%) were emm4-ST39, emm6-ST382 and emm75-ST49, whereas genotypes emm11-ST403, emm28-ST52 and emm25-ST350 accounted for 72.5% of MLS(B)-phenotype isolates. Twenty-five isolates harboured both erm(B) and tet(M) genes related to the Tn916 family of transposons, Tn6002 being the most frequent. Ten isolates (10.1%) were ciprofloxacin non-susceptible, related to the emm6-ST382 clone with a ParC S79A change. CONCLUSIONS: The peak of macrolide resistance rates among S. pyogenes observed in the 2001-2004 period was associated with an increase in the MLS(B) phenotype caused by the spread of emm11-ST403 and emm28-ST52 clones harbouring transposons of the Tn916 family. However, erythromycin resistance rates decreased significantly in the 2007-2008 period.
Authors: M Montes; C Ardanuy; E Tamayo; A Domènech; J Liñares; E Pérez-Trallero Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2011-04-15 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Ina Gajic; Vera Mijac; Lazar Ranin; Edita Grego; Dusan Kekic; Boris Jegorovic; Aleksandra Smitran; Suncica Popovic; Natasa Opavski Journal: Microb Drug Resist Date: 2018-03-20 Impact factor: 3.431
Authors: R Pires; D Rolo; A Morais; A Brito-Avô; C Johansson; B Henriques-Normark; J Gonçalo-Marques; I Santos-Sanches Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2011-10-21 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Mark J Walker; Timothy C Barnett; Jason D McArthur; Jason N Cole; Christine M Gillen; Anna Henningham; K S Sriprakash; Martina L Sanderson-Smith; Victor Nizet Journal: Clin Microbiol Rev Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 26.132
Authors: G Gherardi; D Petrelli; M C Di Luca; F Pimentel de Araujo; P Bernaschi; A Repetto; J Bellesi; L A Vitali Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2015-05-30 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: George A Syrogiannopoulos; Ioanna N Grivea; Adnan Al-Lahham; Maria Panagiotou; Alexandra G Tsantouli; Aspasia N Michoula Ralf René Reinert; Mark van der Linden Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-08-19 Impact factor: 3.240