Literature DB >> 20118151

Impact of femoral vascular closure devices and antithrombotic therapy on access site bleeding in acute coronary syndromes: The Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) trial.

Timothy A Sanborn1, Ramin Ebrahimi, Steven V Manoukian, Brent T McLaurin, David A Cox, Frederick Feit, Martial Hamon, Roxana Mehran, Gregg W Stone.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) trial demonstrated that bivalirudin monotherapy significantly reduces major bleeding compared with heparin (unfractionated or enoxaparin) or bivalirudin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor in acute coronary syndromes. Whether vascular closure devices (VCD) impact these results is unknown. Therefore, this study sought to determine whether VCD impact major access site bleeding (ASB) in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing early invasive management by the femoral approach. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Major ASB in ACUITY was defined as ASB requiring interventional or surgical correction, hematoma > or =5 cm at the access site, retroperitoneal bleeding, or hemoglobin drop > or =3 g/dL with ecchymosis or hematoma <5 cm, oozing blood, or prolonged bleeding (>30 minutes) at the access site. Stepwise logistical regression was performed to identify the independent determinants of ASB. Of 11 621 patients undergoing angiography with or without percutaneous coronary intervention by the femoral approach, 4307 (37.1%) received a VCD and 7314 (62.9%) did not. Rates of major ASB were lower with VCD compared with no VCD (2.5% versus 3.3%, relative risk, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.94; P=0.01) and were lowest in patients treated with bivalirudin monotherapy and a VCD (0.7%). Stepwise logistic regression revealed that a VCD (odds ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.99; P=0.04) and bivalirudin monotherapy (odds ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.49; P<0.0001) were both independent determinates of freedom from major ASB.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing an early invasive management strategy by the femoral approach, the use of a VCD, bivalirudin monotherapy, or both minimizes rates of major ASB. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique Identifier: NCT00093158.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20118151     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.896704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1941-7640            Impact factor:   6.546


  27 in total

Review 1.  Radial versus femoral access for percutaneous coronary intervention: implications for vascular complications and bleeding.

Authors:  Sandeep Nathan; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Temporal trends in and factors associated with bleeding complications among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data CathPCI Registry.

Authors:  Sumeet Subherwal; Eric D Peterson; David Dai; Laine Thomas; John C Messenger; Ying Xian; Ralph G Brindis; Dmitriy N Feldman; Shaun Senter; Lloyd W Klein; Steven P Marso; Matthew T Roe; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Critical lower limb ischemia from an embolized Angio-Seal closure device.

Authors:  Chris Cianci; Robert C Kowal; Georges Feghali; Stephen Hohmann; Robert C Stoler; James W Choi
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2013-10

4.  Effectiveness of Arterial Closure Devices for Preventing Complications With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Instrumental Variable Analysis.

Authors:  Neil J Wimmer; Eric A Secemsky; Laura Mauri; Matthew T Roe; Paramita Saha-Chaudhuri; David Dai; James M McCabe; Frederic S Resnic; Hitinder S Gurm; Robert W Yeh
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 6.546

Review 5.  Achieving safe femoral arterial access.

Authors:  Michael S Lee; Jeremy Kong
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  Access and hemostasis: femoral and popliteal approaches and closure devices-why, what, when, and how?

Authors:  Iacopo Barbetta; Jos C van den Berg
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.513

7.  Influence of Access, Anticoagulant, and Bleeding Definition on Outcomes of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Early Experience of an US Academic Center.

Authors:  M K Bheemarasetti; S Shawar; S Chithri; W I Khalife; U M Rangasetty; K Fujise; S A Gilani
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2015-03

Review 8.  Vascular access and closure in coronary angiography and percutaneous intervention.

Authors:  Robert A Byrne; Salvatore Cassese; Maryam Linhardt; Adnan Kastrati
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 32.419

9.  Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention safety before and during the establishment of a transradial program at a teaching hospital.

Authors:  Robert A Leonardi; Jacob C Townsend; D Dirk Bonnema; Chetan A Patel; Michael T Gibbons; Thomas M Todoran; Christopher D Nielsen; Eric R Powers; Daniel H Steinberg
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Bleeding avoidance strategies. Consensus and controversy.

Authors:  Harold L Dauerman; Sunil V Rao; Frederic S Resnic; Robert J Applegate
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 24.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.