Literature DB >> 20117845

A highly sensitive electrochemiluminescence immunoassay for the neurofilament heavy chain protein.

Jens Kuhle1, Axel Regeniter, David Leppert, Matthias Mehling, Ludwig Kappos, Raija L P Lindberg, Axel Petzold.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The loss of neurological function is closely related to axonal damage. Neurofilament subunits are concentrated in neurons and axons and have emerged as promising biomarkers for neurodegeneration. Electrochemiluminescence (ECL) based assays are known to be of superior sensitivity and require less sample volume than conventional ELISAs.
METHODS: We developed an ECL based solid-phase sandwich immunoassay to measure the neurofilament heavy chain protein (NfH(SMI35)) in CSF. We employed commercially available antibodies as previously used in a conventional ELISA (Petzold et al., 2003; Petzold and Shaw, 2007). The optimised and validated assay was applied in a reference cohort and defined patient groups.
RESULTS: Analytical sensitivity (background plus three SD) of our assay was 2.4 pg/ml. The mean intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) was 4.8% and the inter-assay CV 8.4%. All measured control and patient samples produced signals well above background. Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) (median 46.2 pg/ml, n=95), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) (160.1 pg/ml, n=50), mild cognitive impairment/Alzheimer's disease (MCI/AD) (65.6 pg/ml, n=20), Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) (91.0 pg/ml, n=20) or subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) (345.0 pg/ml, n=20) had higher CSF NfH(SMI35) values than the reference cohort (27.1 pg/ml, n=73, p<0.0001 for each comparison).
CONCLUSION: The new ECL based assay for NfH(SMI35) in CSF is superior in terms of sensitivity, precision and accuracy to previously published methods (Petzold et al., 2003; Shaw et al., 2005; Teunissen et al., 2009). The improved performance and small sample volume requirement qualify this method in experimental settings and clinical trials designed to perform a number of tests on limited amounts of material. Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20117845     DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2010.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neuroimmunol        ISSN: 0165-5728            Impact factor:   3.478


  29 in total

1.  Impact of minocycline on cerebrospinal fluid markers of oxidative stress, neuronal injury, and inflammation in HIV-seropositive individuals with cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Ned Sacktor; Sachiko Miyahara; Scott Evans; Giovanni Schifitto; Bruce Cohen; Norman Haughey; Julia L Drewes; David Graham; M Christine Zink; Caroline Anderson; Avindra Nath; Carlos A Pardo; Sean McCarthy; Lara Hosey; David Clifford
Journal:  J Neurovirol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 2.643

Review 2.  Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers of Alzheimer's Disease: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Donovan A McGrowder; Fabian Miller; Kurt Vaz; Chukwuemeka Nwokocha; Cameil Wilson-Clarke; Melisa Anderson-Cross; Jabari Brown; Lennox Anderson-Jackson; Lowen Williams; Lyndon Latore; Rory Thompson; Ruby Alexander-Lindo
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-02-10

3.  Validation of a serum screen for Alzheimer's disease across assay platforms, species, and tissues.

Authors:  Sid E O'Bryant; Guanghua Xiao; Fan Zhang; Melissa Edwards; Dwight C German; Xiangling Yin; Tori Como; Joan Reisch; Ryan M Huebinger; Neill Graff-Radford; Dennis Dickson; Robert Barber; James Hall; Padraig O'Suilleabhain; Paula Grammas
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.472

4.  A Kv1.3 channel-specific blocker alleviates neurological impairment through inhibiting T-cell activation in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.

Authors:  Xiao-Lu Yuan; Yi-Peng Zhao; Jie Huang; Jun-Chen Liu; Wen-Qian Mao; Jun Yin; Bi-Wen Peng; Wan-Hong Liu; Song Han; Xiao-Hua He
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 5.243

Review 5.  Neurofilaments in disease: what do we know?

Authors:  Brian A Gordon
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Human plasma biomarker responses to inhalational general anaesthesia without surgery.

Authors:  Stacie Deiner; Mark G Baxter; Joshua S Mincer; Mary Sano; James Hall; Ismail Mohammed; Sid O'Bryant; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Roderic Eckenhoff
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 7.  Biomarkers in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: opportunities and limitations.

Authors:  Robert Bowser; Martin R Turner; Jeremy Shefner
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 42.937

8.  Cerebrospinal fluid and blood biomarkers of neuroaxonal damage in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Irena Dujmovic
Journal:  Mult Scler Int       Date:  2011-05-02

9.  Blood and CSF Biomarker Dynamics in Multiple Sclerosis: Implications for Data Interpretation.

Authors:  M J Eikelenboom; B M J Uitdehaag; A Petzold
Journal:  Mult Scler Int       Date:  2011-04-14

10.  CSF neurofilament and N-acetylaspartate related brain changes in clinically isolated syndrome.

Authors:  M Khalil; C Enzinger; C Langkammer; S Ropele; A Mader; A Trentini; M L G Vane; M Wallner-Blazek; G Bachmaier; J-J Archelos; M J A Koel-Simmelink; M A Blankenstein; S Fuchs; F Fazekas; C E Teunissen
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 6.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.