Literature DB >> 20117782

Aneuploidies of chromosomes 1, 4, and 6 are not compatible with human embryos' implantation.

M Cristina Magli1, Luca Gianaroli, Andor Crippa, Santiago Munné, Francesca Robles, Anna P Ferraretti.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To verify whether chromosomes 1, 4, and 6 have a role in determining oocyte viability.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Reproductive Medicine Unit, Società Italiana Studi Medicina della Riproduzione, Bologna, Italy. PATIENT(S): Eighty-five patients with a normal karyotype who had undergone an assisted conception cycle with chromosomal analysis of first polar bodies for chromosomes 13, 15, 16, 18, 21, and 22 (first panel). A clinical pregnancy was obtained in 43 patients, whereas 42 patients were not pregnant. INTERVENTION(S): After conclusion of clinical pregnancies to delivery or abortion, first polar bodies from 85 patients were reanalyzed for chromosomes 1, 4, and 6 (second panel). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Aneuploidy frequency, clinical pregnancy outcome. RESULT(S): The aneuploidy rate contributed by chromosome 1, 4, and 6 to the oocytes that were normal for the first panel was significantly higher in the nonpregnant patients (28%) versus the pregnant patients (11%), whereas no difference resulted between term pregnancies (11%) and abortions (10%). This trend was also observed when studying the first polar bodies from the oocytes that originated the transferred embryos. The frequency of aneuploidy for chromosomes 1 and 4 was comparable with that of chromosomes 15, 16, 21, and 22. CONCLUSION(S): Aneuploidy of chromosomes 1, 4, and 6 seems to be related to failed implantation and not to spontaneous abortions.
Copyright © 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20117782     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  3 in total

1.  Polar body array CGH for prediction of the status of the corresponding oocyte. Part I: clinical results.

Authors:  Joep Geraedts; Markus Montag; M Cristina Magli; Sjoerd Repping; Alan Handyside; Catherine Staessen; Joyce Harper; Andreas Schmutzler; John Collins; Veerle Goossens; Hans van der Ven; Katerina Vesela; Luca Gianaroli
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Associations of recurrent miscarriages with chromosomal abnormalities, thrombophilia allelic polymorphisms and/or consanguinity in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Rola F Turki; Mourad Assidi; Huda A Banni; Hanan A Zahed; Sajjad Karim; Hans-Juergen Schulten; Muhammad Abu-Elmagd; Abdulrahim A Rouzi; Osama Bajouh; Hassan S Jamal; Mohammed H Al-Qahtani; Adel M Abuzenadah
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 2.103

3.  Chromosome-specific DNA repeats: rapid identification in silico and validation using fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  Joanne H Hsu; Hui Zeng; Kalistyn H Lemke; Aris A Polyzos; Jingly F Weier; Mei Wang; Anna R Lawin-O'Brien; Heinz-Ulrich G Weier; Benjamin O'Brien
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 5.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.